Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me
	designates 208.79.240.5 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=208.79.240.5; envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me;
	helo=smtpauth.rollernet.us; 
From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <C8D44AB3-1868-4255-9B6C-5AEE72C535C4@jrbobdobbs.org>
References: <1309478838.3689.25.camel@Desktop666>
	<20110701080042.GA657@ulyssis.org>
	<BANLkTim-QWvtfL65mo3uW7ESiehKOmHjtw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=DWUhGmoHcQB5EPZHF71JE71gcTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1309524016.2541.0.camel@Desktop666>
	<BANLkTimobc7471uBMLBecYT3vz0GO6RLzQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110701163558.GA7311@dax.lan.local>
	<C8D44AB3-1868-4255-9B6C-5AEE72C535C4@jrbobdobbs.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-ZDUAbbRKC4XibV5+/UiP"
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 19:50:40 +0200
Message-ID: <1309542640.2541.20.camel@Desktop666>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.3.24
Precedence: list


--=-ZDUAbbRKC4XibV5+/UiP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Totally agree it really shouldnt be a vote, in the end UPnP is bad for
an individual (more bandwidth usage, etc), but good for the network.
That means people will vote against it, but in the end someone has to
make the tough decision and turn it on.

Also, bitcoind is prebuilt in the daemon folder on the download archives
(though Im not sure about OSX)

Matt
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 12:47 -0500, Douglas Huff wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2011, at 11:35 AM, jan@uos.de wrote:
>=20
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 11:06:56AM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> >>> Not sure about OS differentiation, seems...wrong?  Maybe disabled by
> >>> default on bitcoind but on by default on bitcoin?
> >>=20
> >> OK.  I mis-remembered the poll:
> >>   http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=3D4392.0
> >>=20
> >> On by default	                       8 (20%)
> >> Off by default	                       22 (55%)
> >> On by default in the GUI, off by default in bitcoind	 10 (25%)
> >=20
> > I just voted as well and now - with some extra votes in the meantime -
> > it's 9 / 22 / 13. So exactly 50/50 between off (22) and some form of on
> > (9 + 13).
> >=20
> > I'm in favor of turning it on by default in the GUI and leaving it off
> > in bitcoind.
> >=20
> > I don't like UPnP much, I find it exemplifies exactly what is wrong wit=
h
> > computer security today: Convenience trumps security almost every time.
>=20
> I don't think this should be a vote at all. Given Greg/Matt's numbers it =
is a necessity to ensure network stability over the next 90 days.
>=20
> Also: the default will only apply to pre-built binaries, which bitcoind i=
sn't one of, so for people running bitcoind this default doesn't matter at =
all. Just continue building without UPNP support as you're already doing.


--=-ZDUAbbRKC4XibV5+/UiP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=6RJl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-ZDUAbbRKC4XibV5+/UiP--