Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YzdFV-0008C2-LG for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:52:21 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.192.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.192.171; envelope-from=gappleto97@gmail.com; helo=mail-pd0-f171.google.com; Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YzdFU-0005GI-H4 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:52:21 +0000 Received: by pdjm12 with SMTP id m12so40213514pdj.3 for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 20:52:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.238.228 with SMTP id vn4mr8620103pbc.166.1433217134812; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 20:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.194.168 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 20:52:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <556CDB09.8050906@henricson.se> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:52:14 -0400 Message-ID: From: gabe appleton To: Ethan Heilman Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33d95034e7ba051780debe X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gappleto97[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (gappleto97[at]gmail.com) 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YzdFU-0005GI-H4 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:52:21 -0000 --047d7b33d95034e7ba051780debe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I don't have permission to create a page. If someone else does, I'll happily get a framework started. On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Ethan Heilman wrote: > I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails > generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the various > positions and arguments would be extremely helpful. > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton > wrote: > >> Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we could >> condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to assist if >> the page gets approval. >> On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson" wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate >>> drives me nuts. >>> >>> I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles: >>> >>> 1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will >>> take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other >>> smarter people have said over and over before, you're >>> wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't. >>> >>> 2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is >>> just destructive. If you want no change, then say so. >>> >>> Mats >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bitcoin-development mailing list >>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bitcoin-development mailing list >> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >> >> > --047d7b33d95034e7ba051780debe Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I don't have permission to create a page. If someone e= lse does, I'll happily get a framework started.

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Et= han Heilman <eth3rs@gmail.com> wrote:
I second this, I don't have time to read th= e large number of emails generated every day from the block size debate. A = summary of the various positions and arguments would be extremely helpful.= =C2=A0

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe ap= pleton <gappleto97@gmail.com> wrote:

Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the de= bate? That way we could condense the information as much as possible. I'= ;ll be willing to assist if the page gets approval.

On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson&quo= t; <mats@henricso= n.se> wrote:
= Hi!

My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate
drives me nuts.

I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:

1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will
=C2=A0 =C2=A0take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other
=C2=A0 =C2=A0smarter people have said over and over before, you're
=C2=A0 =C2=A0wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't.

2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is
=C2=A0 =C2=A0just destructive. If you want no change, then say so.

Mats

---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment

-----------------------------------------------------------= -------------------

_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment



--047d7b33d95034e7ba051780debe--