Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1WxmxO-0005pD-4u
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:45:30 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
	designates 62.13.148.110 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=62.13.148.110; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
	helo=outmail148110.authsmtp.com; 
Received: from outmail148110.authsmtp.com ([62.13.148.110])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1WxmxM-0000xk-Ac for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:45:30 +0000
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
	by punt14.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s5K0jL6J036981; 
	Fri, 20 Jun 2014 01:45:21 +0100 (BST)
Received: from savin (76-10-178-109.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.178.109])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s5K0jG1m092186
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Fri, 20 Jun 2014 01:45:19 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 20:45:29 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavin@bitcoinfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20140620004529.GE18072@savin>
References: <CABsx9T2+_tLOPELm+K54D=6SNkHg1ZeO_T1jSM=CQZYJKGODFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140618001503.GA8360@savin>
	<CABsx9T2O42pER0b1v9oeU14_K=KVWVqHzcfFmWAhSxoYAn12vg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140619100909.GA3544@savin>
	<CABsx9T1uC9sMzbPJa4MGpBNoQ4S255Tfo66+wwCoND_bQtvT7Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZRyEpB+iJ+qUx0kp"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T1uC9sMzbPJa4MGpBNoQ4S255Tfo66+wwCoND_bQtvT7Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 279266cf-f814-11e3-b396-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
	http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
	aAdMdAIUEkAaAgsB AmIbW1VeVFh7WGo7 bAxPbAVDY01GQQRq
	WVdMSlVNFUsrBGcB XGkfDxl7dQROfjB4 YENkEHJcVUZ8cxUr
	XxhcFGkbZGY1a31N U0leagNUcgZDfk5E bwQuUz1vNG8XDQg5
	AwQ0PjZ0MThBJSBS WgQAK04nCX4RGSY7 XBkGT301EEkMV20v
	LxFuC0UnAE8XPkwo PRM7RFYVKFccDRc8 V3kXOw8RO0MIQTEi Bh9bWkgFeAAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.178.109/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
	anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1WxmxM-0000xk-Ac
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for
 P2SH transactions
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:45:30 -0000


--ZRyEpB+iJ+qUx0kp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:54:31AM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> RE: soft-forks bumping version numbers:
>=20
> Yes, we have consensus that is the way we will do it.  I should probably
> turn https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/2355445 into an informational
> BIP.

Sounds like it could turn EvalScript() into a mess over time, but that's
a long way away. Anyway a BIP will be useful.

> RE: malleability:
>=20
> Orthogonal (but related) issue to IsStandard.
>=20
> Detecting Scripts that leave extra items on the stack will be done in a
> different part of the code than the code addressed by this pull reques. No
> need to execute the Script twice to figure out if it leaves extra stuff,
> and the idea behind IsStandard is to get to a quick yes/no before running=
 a
> potentially expensive Script execution.

Yeah, that's what I implemented in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/=
4311

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000004f73d48c972aa30493526191aa009f95e4a71dcfbdca08b2

--ZRyEpB+iJ+qUx0kp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
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==
=eSba
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZRyEpB+iJ+qUx0kp--