Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9225B171B for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:50:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ECED2F for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:50:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so23564800wic.0 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:50:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZeRP0LYfA3820wPaIESuPdgcLxndLtSVR7X+EdooepM=; b=omWlzcflhBwaM4MbU4kvHNoLdGq69HgfR54iYyPSVv6lNRvQJFTMLEFQ2dbs17e9i5 gCujWe+VCEuT/9ZdU7EkAJCFrwPGMjTScVxqJcCJ0FAWrk1aNUF0vC08hZHOL7SeKplq YbLkg4Gt6fLFOGQh4Hzt2ZB3b0gmExCLuwpqNrOlLMemBkmAjEZ2VuSGzL2H0HKzTakx Wh8U5OAUxeU7w45CEuEHjBkAd0OxFvFTP2l/x2Ct9VMfC9YID7jfT1/i3x8BVfQNPplm xziJCEnaSS221XPQSsNNV1YYOIFDN1NzAD7bX6ck4nc5GsZsrP2PLltCXiYePhFopPLx j5bg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.88.4 with SMTP id bc4mr2814714wib.68.1443696635659; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.158.9 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 03:50:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20150924112555.GA21355@amethyst.visucore.com> <201509301757.44035.luke@dashjr.org> <20151001085058.GA10010@amethyst.visucore.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:50:35 -0400 Message-ID: From: Jeff Garzik To: Marcel Jamin Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428ee421ca0a052108d154 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:50:37 -0000 --f46d04428ee421ca0a052108d154 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I guess the question then becomes why bitcoin still is <1.0.0 > I've said the same thing years ago. Originally the "1.0" was a target for whenever "client mode" as planned by Satoshi was implemented, making the Bitcoin Core implementation feature-complete for as a minimum working/viable project. Ultimately it is not so important and tends to generate a lot of discussion - so maybe we should just do the emacs thing and go from 0.12 to 12.0 for next version. --f46d04428ee421ca0a052108d154 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-d= ev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
I guess the question then becomes w= hy bitcoin still is <1.0.0

I'v= e said the same thing years ago.=C2=A0 Originally the "1.0" was a= target for whenever "client mode" as planned by Satoshi was impl= emented, making the Bitcoin Core implementation feature-complete for as a m= inimum working/viable project.

Ultimately it is no= t so important and tends to generate a lot of discussion =C2=A0- so maybe w= e should just do the emacs thing and go from 0.12 to 12.0 for next version.=

=C2=A0
--f46d04428ee421ca0a052108d154--