Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BBDC000E; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 11:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B17240239; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 11:58:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VHdF7RgBnn-n; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 11:58:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC03A4022D; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 11:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id h17so11888179ljh.13; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 04:58:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2eRJfCE1BZ6SHRgIsUrUcjxyhLNiwY2K7YD35WoWxo8=; b=r5x453UEmsRtsk8jJxrTHxmQLpRL19reuYmocTQPrh031KdN2f4ikUxQ63Rh8V6Npq vATY60ZqhtNqthnXSm60LjmBFM/0NsEclVmwVxvYno3mAzhkLQX4ioWhuUiQ4E931w/i OpV0Mv/BNk4KXsUXDRbvrcx5uDI4oJ85AZh0Hwy7mLajRZcKzyEmdKLWVt8OeCwcNX2u Y/Qt3qnxWKRmsWjtBFUsbabIPDodQofJQFweM8S5xN5wBDTwVHe0Y46DE1UgjNxS8eIi pzUDlRl7E5sug9LRUEC1HkI2WsWAfeGXNEKNxwNEVtsqT2EGtDld8Dyq+Q1e7PGLv8/0 Giog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2eRJfCE1BZ6SHRgIsUrUcjxyhLNiwY2K7YD35WoWxo8=; b=Xbc8TxFESc9kEYjLF5m4YgxcOCFRfHCSL9s7xSc+H185LjrjhuJELhrjClOyeQZydw lbMY3FGeILcfs8DprOWyO5Q3S0227nFgkMD5oMTH1reQMfqY0rX0x3AUc7mWI9WdHTgy dosFf6VZaIPkT8/OgduarzVxbwmBz+UhS5OvIbSBXyvM3ZZ1Q+v85G608Age+0OcsPAc 2TXJNMzCUhgmK/HfuTid3KIHFOALYxKhqIksWjXgd79Jm2JJbD3KxRBuHQv5a8op2AcN GbrOHIA8i4uzw9dEJ+a6sHhXI6v9ViQC/1CKDWtEQ4O5AEhicOxqpZ9mHfjqkhfejL82 J8kA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533JUAMUnlI/6N3AN5JVxBo/regZ6IwNext8WaGfmMlWOVfayEF6 aO2fkChYBtfaR54lzExcymL0SQXOYO/eYY5EafGkJZ97Yow= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwczQVK3PAzDN0qp9DsbmOV23fX/ax52EML5IQmC9o8/Y3iw1fU9vDESoi9l90NifqPDsluuPBgMbXVLXqNwPo= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b88a:: with SMTP id r10mr8244816ljp.358.1628510295527; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 04:58:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Karl Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 07:58:03 -0400 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ad95c605c91f19a1" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 12:06:19 +0000 Cc: lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removing the Dust Limit X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 11:58:19 -0000 --000000000000ad95c605c91f19a1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Why would removing the dust limit impact decentralisation of mining if miners can reconfigure the dust limit for their mined blocks? --000000000000ad95c605c91f19a1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Why would removing the dust limit impact decentralisation of mining if miners can reconfigure the dust limit for their mined blocks?
--000000000000ad95c605c91f19a1--