Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EBF2B9B for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 19:42:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-lj1-f172.google.com (mail-lj1-f172.google.com [209.85.208.172]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2EB78C for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 19:42:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f172.google.com with SMTP id q128so12459426ljb.11 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 11:42:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9R3eVXOFHQVbuKRu4dLVTXdZLUalSkNE3AOqTklPrg0=; b=NkY/3zrMTcXj00Jpg8NUgFEApHDwfw7VRF1K3UeR6BbMDkGgr9Xv8EtbKeO+0WHE3Z IA+L7vxx6nq1PVqPBIXrYDMPxCArgVb781V2iSKEf3ogIANyCcghBRtiac4FrdTKv9qc n6w2Y+RrMAAtbLFUBk4uJVeVK0LRPQ74gnpX93cCnVkfE5cfb+PRfRWtXzkWVTnzx07e CaEpEOVJPnHwf066NfMpU+dn8Drtbm6cIZJWHVdju0cfsR5aY0wOR64hJ1lUqbaDnunS 5T0e2MBN9Iihxr/+XKLVxAPu381DAhTtHt1BHiYd1QMTzpn5a+cEx/Zv5grtjjxVUNsM Dt0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=9R3eVXOFHQVbuKRu4dLVTXdZLUalSkNE3AOqTklPrg0=; b=ZWbYj6OwqbYRGFYjfCCUyRlA1kHqRf+H8rNWPUQKIErmULIwrmmrPelQbe5Pyo36yK HMskZLL5HIAQXH2IT3/FMLC89yQbLN3lA+vQ7zR8IcnUn7hxEFO4/P415KXtKfbWusNt IBU+fpOprgfIZoFHwqapgkQMiEQdawYAItPxfBXgMR2qvjtc+Rhv+x6csOvf1hDEdOck KwzdpM1sJA0z2B48dIIm5q/pFj4ul7lEev9gjad1sTrbzNfxZIWxuctVdiyalCGjOg/+ XYBCEiqpKhDg/6BvLaZy+GLX4IL9a1x7jYY72U9Ha7Jf8CfkZL4OHpS4O9QcouKbkc/x 8Eog== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubyfRDu16j7DL/W7FmQ3IhsvM/LFzoAUsKzhJMOw6V6/iAiK2SA m1oba/DwwBDeIXdOkX8pyXOtX7sAdeYjEDMERGM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbtoSF1odAE38tI/fXI38kPjyim7e444MGJZr7BjZM/d6k8HwjELOFXTTQbdwb9iA8XgtwAzmhcC5BgDRLQgl0= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3a04:: with SMTP id h4mr381387lja.50.1550432537979; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 11:42:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Adam Ficsor Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 20:42:05 +0100 Message-ID: To: Christopher Gilliard , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000acb18d05821c341b" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 19:44:53 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal - Signatures of Messages using Bitcoin Private Keys X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 19:42:21 -0000 --000000000000acb18d05821c341b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In Wasabi wallet we are in the finishing line of an encryption manager. I'll ask the OP to review your BIP and probably I'll do it myself, too before I'd merge. Feel free to review/test our PR, too: https://github.com/zkSNACKs/WalletWasabi/pull/1127 On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 6:01 PM Christopher Gilliard via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I have written up a proposed BIP. It has to do with Signature formats whe= n > using Bitcoin Private keys. It is here: > https://github.com/cgilliard/BIP/blob/master/README.md > > This BIP was written up as suggested in this github issue: > https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10542 > > Note that the proposal is inline with the implementation that Trezor > implemented in the above issue. > > Any feedback would be appreciated. Please let me know what the steps are > with regards to getting a BIP number assigned or any other process steps > required. > > Regards, > Chris > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > --=20 Best, =C3=81d=C3=A1m --000000000000acb18d05821c341b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In Wasabi wallet we are in the finishing line of an encryp= tion manager. I'll ask the OP to review your BIP and probably I'll = do it myself, too before I'd merge. Feel free to review/test our PR, to= o: https://g= ithub.com/zkSNACKs/WalletWasabi/pull/1127=C2=A0=C2=A0

On Sun, Feb 17= , 2019 at 6:01 PM Christopher Gilliard via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.= org> wrote:
I have written up a p= roposed BIP. It has to do with Signature formats when using Bitcoin Private= keys. It is here:=C2=A0https://github.com/cgilliard/BIP/blob/mas= ter/README.md

This BIP was written= up as suggested in this github issue:=C2=A0https://github.com/bitcoin/b= itcoin/issues/10542

Note that the proposal is = inline with the implementation that Trezor implemented in the above issue.<= /div>

Any feedback would be=C2=A0appreciated= . Please let me know what the steps are with regards to getting a BIP numbe= r assigned or any other process steps required.

Re= gards,
Chris
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
= bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev


--
Best,
=C3=81d= =C3=A1m
--000000000000acb18d05821c341b--