Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Qdrek-0006wZ-QW for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 22:30:18 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.47; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-qw0-f47.google.com; Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Qdrej-0000FK-VW for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 22:30:18 +0000 Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so3489775qwh.34 for ; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:30:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.241.205 with SMTP id lf13mr848340qcb.292.1309818612460; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:30:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.83.196 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 15:30:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5196CA67-B84A-4413-BE6D-504811EAA954@jrbobdobbs.org> References: <1309801974.3423.80.camel@Desktop666> <5196CA67-B84A-4413-BE6D-504811EAA954@jrbobdobbs.org> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 18:30:12 -0400 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Douglas Huff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Qdrej-0000FK-VW Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Encrypted Wallet Backward Compatibility X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 22:30:18 -0000 On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Douglas Huff wrote: > > On Jul 4, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: >> RE: breaking backup scripts: =C2=A0if they use the backupwallet =C2=A0RP= C >> command, then they will Just Work. > > I'd go a step further and say that, since import/export is planned to get= merged at about the same time, intentionally breaking unsafe/badly designe= d backup mechanisms is actually desirable. Silently breaking them, not so much. Or do you think people are going to notice that they've started backing up a zero byte file?