Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TFu7w-0003Me-H1 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:54:12 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.175; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f175.google.com; Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1TFu7t-0004gB-Lx for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:54:12 +0000 Received: by wiwc10 with SMTP id c10so413447wiw.10 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:54:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.193.158 with SMTP id k30mr6437813wen.89.1348437243390; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:54:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.139.134 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:54:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:54:03 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: rKdkE1bNDCI10GEFrqaICIcO2Mg Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: Gregory Maxwell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1TFu7t-0004gB-Lx Cc: Bitcoin Development Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Large backlog of transactions building up? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:54:12 -0000 > Sounds good=E2=80=94 my only concern is that nodes will repeat their own > transactions but not the unconfirmed parents. Nodes repeat wallet transactions and any previous transactions that are not yet included in the chain (see CWalletTx::RelayWalletTransaction). So I don't think it's an issue. (ok, bitcoinj clients don't do that, they just announce their own transacti= ons)