Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>) id 1SfZGI-0000AD-IV for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:20:38 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me designates 173.246.101.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.246.101.161; envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me; helo=mail.bluematt.me; Received: from vps.bluematt.me ([173.246.101.161] helo=mail.bluematt.me) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1SfZGF-0001Ap-2Q for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:20:38 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:ee55:f9ff:fec6:e666] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:ee55:f9ff:fec6:e666]) by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23EA1398F; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1339777227.31489.89.camel@bmthinkpad> From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me> To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:20:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <CA+8xBpfHpMX5FUJz4HSYxOoeDEGZ0S4Ufz1pRYbwJLcPiVw_CA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA+8xBpecVQcTTbPxUm_3_GWC99dEd4=-VFWb+QT6jUy4rg8U4w@mail.gmail.com> <CANEZrP0kNZDByHpK2=UjP+ag0X1KmqHxnJdm=e_pWMitP4QvvA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+8xBpcwhQPQRe=stYb9xksLsTbiABKLS7PZnRtvPga6AmSg4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CANEZrP39RHfCDX-x4ARo+oPphLv-70RxuMh3+AJzsNPxzOd=bA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+8xBpfHpMX5FUJz4HSYxOoeDEGZ0S4Ufz1pRYbwJLcPiVw_CA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1SfZGF-0001Ap-2Q Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New P2P commands for diagnostics, SPV clients X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:20:38 -0000 On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 11:32 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > As for full nodes... I like the organic growth and random nature of > the mempools. On the fence, WRT full node mempool sync at startup. > I dont particularly care either way, but I have a feeling miners will really want that so that they can get fee-paying transactions right away. Matt