Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 111694D3 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:43:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.help.org (mail.help.org [70.90.2.18]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 866B717D for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.10.25] (B [10.1.10.25]) by mail.help.org with ESMTPA ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:43:45 -0400 To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <8185694.hShCHQnpze@coldstorage> <20150808085451.4689995.38052.4163@thomaszander.se> <1725491.c810VbMBxP@coldstorage> From: Milly Bitcoin Message-ID: <55C90D04.9050707@bitcoins.info> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:43:48 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] trust X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:43:54 -0000 > I think the point "you don't need to trust anyone to use Bitcoin" remains. I don't think that is a true statement. Users need to trust the mining system is working as intended. Users also need to trust the developers to a certain extent. It is about levels of trust and how much you need to trust these things. When someone says something is "trustless" or "decentralized" they are really saying that it reaches some sort of "acceptable" level in their mind to "brand" it that way. Russ