Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA42EC000B for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A698333E for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:14:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.602 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XnrhyVLmJhMJ for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:14:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-oo1-xc2c.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2c]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD7D83218 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oo1-xc2c.google.com with SMTP id g9-20020a4ad3090000b02901ec6daba49aso2294310oos.6 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:14:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=G6kfAoP1TmJMHPjesb9jIQ4zpxvS5lMHlryZ7a8Rskk=; b=LuU4O5AOae/ZxTqmkXCm1A/TGc0KJXBV58my0W5DsbF6ovZCu9wvqPwwzLCsbbp8N6 mEtgonKBM+MwKcL0bMiz+PCoir9as7yvt+TO5cVmJZi6R4ZmTnu32aB/r3qgFPFf+Kvw OsaxaxwBt2Yl5XZr0FjxIoO/VhQ90t3EOIHXVR+eAJHJcFKsEvkL1n8ov/kKaG6ZgyxN AR4CyAubXFjGJ4ily1yAH6e/EhJ9ih6GWBG8enH+PFalopoYWMtplNUUTwxw3addwVRF 9OqsSj6L+LVTv/O7uCYW71v8RlDyuIfwFj98lh4ltu0WcpOqmSlnLyD6Oa9g9e4H0Fy6 hO1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G6kfAoP1TmJMHPjesb9jIQ4zpxvS5lMHlryZ7a8Rskk=; b=sR6cZHWyePiblXoIp+0wcL/f7SWvo5+GTL+XeGru9tBjq4ZHVYUg+7xXORZw/iJMsD jwWpN+gj2a1cWkfIrZWqe1LcYijmTseZAESDTbYZo2I+OWZ06SUyevUWU73/N6oAQFLI JBYCllAFt1lpYaRlWVnXmr2FeFhpKC9ckQ/apTdRQUqjv9ntlhwg0uX0j/O5SAWZE5mj 0V2DTkdS9DkJ5f14gEvzVuh1Y1mZh3GhNooWv4NIuUB0vO6iLfSSrLd0YoKJhW+Wcy0t +Er7Cy8qLO0GWb9GbJgcIsomPKHJv9Yz9YErkemBNVrtpIKlATeIsf95ZXcGzw3OOPh1 lIqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532MNBFXnMtMpWbXux2WLxGXP7dh8y8suZWlOvZlsp7kEiVgV2Nq RjYC9UJW4ur3lEdhDC0ADH7sppqZswMU4gNe5H4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDI4FEfuwL7b6bATpPBDy1U4a1HDLoZMXwJRuAPb7ycsgcCWPL7HRQBAsZCTGNCBHXksBOOZ5ORmWABYlrOns= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:94c3:: with SMTP id l3mr15565572ooi.12.1619000071287; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:14:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Christopher Gilliard Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 03:14:20 -0700 Message-ID: To: Prayank Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000023f8e905c078d405" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:56:11 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIPs - notarization protocol and decentralized storage X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:14:34 -0000 --00000000000023f8e905c078d405 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Thanks Prayank. I think the next step for both of these proposals is to define an API. I thought about including that in the BIPs and decided it wasn't necessary yet to get the ideas across initially. Maybe when the APIs are defined they could go into the BIP, but it's probably better to have in a different document. I also agree with you on Tor. As far as whether this should be a BIP or not, I wondered that same question. I think the BIP format is well defined and understood so I used it for this and the other BIPs that I'm currently working on like the incentivized moderation protocol which is mentioned in this BIP. There are a number of "Application" BIPs, which is why I decided it made sense. However, if it's decided there's a better format for these BIPs I'm open to it. Regards, Chris On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:26 PM Prayank wrote: > Hello Christopher, > > Decentralized storage as an idea looks interesting. I am researching about > similar things for one of my Bitcoin project. Although an implementation or > proof of concept code in the BIP would have been better. Also since this > involves LN, maybe it can just be a LN project instead of BIP? Not the best > person to comment on what can be a BIP. > > Few links that you may find interesting: > > https://github.com/bkiac/tarnhelm > > https://github.com/ElementsProject/filebazaar > > The kind of decentralized storage that I think can be helpful for Bitcoin > projects: > > 1.Uses torrents for files and communication required (with Tor) > > 2.Easy to use API to save, read, edit etc. something in a Bitcoin project > using torrents. Only involve lightning network and payments when spamming > can be an issue. For example: If a developer wants users to pay for every > P2P offer they create using a DEX protocol. > > Projects that are exploring such options: > https://github.com/JoinMarket-Org/joinmarket-clientserver/issues/415 > > -- > Prayank > --00000000000023f8e905c078d405 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Prayank. I think the next step for both of these pr= oposals is to define an API. I thought about including that in the BIPs and= decided it wasn't necessary yet to get the ideas across initially. May= be when the APIs are defined they could go into the BIP, but it's proba= bly better to have in a different document. I also agree with you on Tor.
As far as whether this should be a BIP or not, I wondered= that same question. I think the BIP format is well defined and understood = so I used it for this and the other BIPs that I'm currently working on = like the incentivized moderation protocol which is mentioned in this BIP. T= here are a number of "Application" BIPs, which is why I decided i= t made sense. However, if it's decided there's a better format for = these BIPs I'm open to it.

Regards,
= Chris



On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:26 PM Pr= ayank <prayank@tutanota.de>= ; wrote:
=20 =20 =20
Hello Christopher,

Decentralized storage = as an idea looks interesting. I am researching about similar things for one= of my Bitcoin project. Although an implementation or proof of concept code= in the BIP would have been better. Also since this involves LN, maybe it c= an just be a LN project instead of BIP? Not the best person to comment on w= hat can be a BIP.

Few links that you may find = interesting:

https://github.com/bkiac/tarnhelm


The kind of decentralized storage that I think = can be helpful for Bitcoin projects:

1.Uses to= rrents for files and communication required (with Tor)

2.Easy to use API to save, read, edit etc. something in a Bitcoin = project using torrents. Only involve lightning network and payments when sp= amming can be an issue. For example: If a developer wants users to pay for = every P2P offer they create using a DEX protocol.

<= div>Projects that are exploring such options:=C2=A0= https://github.com/JoinMarket-Org/joinmarket-clientserver/issues/415

--
Prayank
--00000000000023f8e905c078d405--