Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WHySh-0007af-SC for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:32:59 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.49; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com; helo=mail-wg0-f49.google.com; Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WHySh-0006Kq-1U for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:32:59 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id y10so4799660wgg.28 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:32:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gjq6F780iyeT4rzb63JeRuLD8pU7tLI1j89eAZLqg0I=; b=lKpUcXXwvsCJ0dRu5IV+PYy2bdrUYq9kM1IJe8NdOcr5S35khRwIRpEsbe6PKMGfuk EGjRVzyCjLkOmf/zaIdCQ0j2z/BKxHRJCBQpxN3kbdXNhNNPXF0XW0hn6d39etKAtyOV L/kzk3AzHeYSozQvl7uHMqxNx+98Wdi/UL1jAopyoyoFlHysRf9Co1euNdIAPVYBBjnL vuEPuZZEnaTm8bxrfMemK9Gn73AbsCnp4Xsxfvs7fYCrmQSLABJs6t0EKpwE3Jc7dbeD 1Rj1CffOTFEaeUtbK+CLZaeqT65QhTiMcJ5SBt4sQ6pEiuf6wN2mHNJPp674OFE2q70t gSgw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQntF0lFaNz34sZiONXxP9mqYiz/G1MtGbmA4WYEivc0ZrMYu93stYf3FrQHKoawI7HOVrvh MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.195.12.5 with SMTP id em5mr7201466wjd.77.1393259572608; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:32:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.82.197 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:32:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:32:52 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeff Garzik To: Pieter Wuille Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WHySh-0006Kq-1U Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 release X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:33:00 -0000 Not really -- a MasterCoin transaction or JPEG On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Pieter Wuille wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> I do think >> regular transactions should have the ability to include some metadata. > > and > >> 2) Endorsement of chain data storage. >> >> Nothing could be further from the truth. > > These two statements are in direct contradiction with each other. > > -- > Pieter -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/