Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.192.52 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.192.52;
	envelope-from=martin.habovstiak@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-qg0-f52.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP2V0+M5B0P3T6cUqmSh-0FTP5_VgNcegwQTQQM7XMfMsA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1422667849.25602.6.camel@TARDIS>
	<CANEZrP2V0+M5B0P3T6cUqmSh-0FTP5_VgNcegwQTQQM7XMfMsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 19:47:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CALkkCJav7gQuDuPvWc_SOgVJGyfAorSWGHMvUjUTGZBJcGnNYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Habov=C5=A1tiak?= <martin.habovstiak@gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP: protocol for multisignature
	payments
Precedence: list

I know about that wiki page. I just wanted to design protocol which
would make it easier in practice. (now it would be done manually)

I could look at implementing it someday, but now I'd like to receive
feedback from community.

2015-01-31 19:19 GMT+02:00 Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>:
> Hi Martin,
>
> You're on the right lines. Your writeup is pretty similar to the high lev=
el
> overview given here though:
>
> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Contracts#Example_2:_Escrow_and_dispute_mediat=
ion
>
> To make 2-of-3 dispute mediation works requires implementing a wallet tha=
t
> supports it, and the tools mediators need to manage incoming tickets, etc=
.
> The BIP70 extension is probably the smallest part of the project.
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Martin Habov=C5=A1tiak
> <martin.habovstiak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been thinking about how to solve security problems of the servers
>> holding huge amounts of bitcoins (exchanges, markets...) and came up
>> with this idea: https://gist.github.com/Kixunil/2ec79cf40a53fb899ac5
>>
>> TL;DR: it's extension of BIP70 (but not fully compatible due to security
>> reasons) which supports making of multisig transactions dynamically.
>> (The most important thing is that the user provides his address.)
>>
>> What do you think? Is it a good way to solve the problem or do you know
>> about something better? I would really like this or something similar
>> implemented by wallets.
>>
>> Thank you for your feedback!
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------=
------
>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
>> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
>> your
>> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
>> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take=
 a
>> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>
>