Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:27:27 +0200
Message-Id: <CRTXCM2IHVCZ.3OICMAE871TH2@vincent-arch>
From: "Vincenzo Palazzo" <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
To: "Murch" <murch@murch.one>, "Bitcoin Protocol Discussion"
 <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <e2293b77-aef3-62cf-01e3-d89a7beb8e8c@murch.one>
 <6bb373cc-bee0-13a3-a510-b65d4faa867f@murch.one>
In-Reply-To: <6bb373cc-bee0-13a3-a510-b65d4faa867f@murch.one>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Seeking concept ACKs for transaction terminology
 BIP
Precedence: list

On Wed Apr 5, 2023 at 8:54 PM CEST, Murch via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Over the years, I have participated in a few conversations about various=
=20
> aspects of transactions. Often a chunk of the conversation is spent on=20
> establishing a shared vocabulary. There are many competing terms=E2=80=94=
e.g. I=20
> can think of at least three additional terms that refer to `scriptPubKey`=
.
>
> I=E2=80=99ve drafted an informational BIP that proposes terminology for v=
arious=20
> components and aspects of transactions. As some established terms are=20
> already contradictory, the proposal does not aim for a perfectly=20
> consistent selection of terms, but rather just to establish a shared=20
> vocabulary to avoid confusion.
>
> Draft: https://github.com/Xekyo/bips/pull/1
>
> Please let me know whether you=E2=80=99d be interested in the creation of=
 such a=20
> BIP.

Make a lot of sense to me, just recently I found that=20
I was using a complete different word to refering to `scriptPubKey`=20
that only me was using :)

So, concept ACK.

Thanks!

Vincent.