Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YsU8C-0006ER-3p for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 13 May 2015 10:43:16 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.176; envelope-from=tier.nolan@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk0-f176.google.com; Received: from mail-qk0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YsU8A-0002oc-Bh for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 13 May 2015 10:43:16 +0000 Received: by qkgx75 with SMTP id x75so24874294qkg.1 for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 03:43:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.132.80 with SMTP id 77mr27184677qhe.36.1431513788802; Wed, 13 May 2015 03:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.85.241 with HTTP; Wed, 13 May 2015 03:43:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <16096345.A1MpJQQkRW@crushinator> Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 11:43:08 +0100 Message-ID: From: Tier Nolan Cc: Bitcoin Development Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c07daadf72520515f44664 X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (tier.nolan[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 1.9 MALFORMED_FREEMAIL Bad headers on message from free email service 0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address X-Headers-End: 1YsU8A-0002oc-Bh Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:43:16 -0000 --001a11c07daadf72520515f44664 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > An example would > be tx_size = MAX( real_size >> 1, real_size + 4*utxo_created_size - > 3*utxo_consumed_size). This could be implemented as a soft fork too. * 1MB hard size limit * 900kB soft limit S = block size U = UTXO_adjusted_size = S + 4 * outputs - 3 * inputs A block is valid if S < 1MB and U < 1MB A 250 byte transaction with 2 inputs and 2 outputs would have an adjusted size of 252 bytes. The memory pool could be sorted by fee per adjusted_size. Coin selection could be adjusted so it tries to have at least 2 inputs when creating transactions, unless the input is worth more than a threshold (say 0.001 BTC). This is a pretty weak incentive, especially if the block size is increased. Maybe it will cause a "nudge" --001a11c07daadf72520515f44664 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On S= at, May 9, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>= wrote:
An example would
be tx_size =3D MAX( real_size >> 1,=C2=A0 real_size + 4*utxo_created_= size -
3*utxo_consumed_size).=C2=A0

This could be = implemented as a soft fork too.

* 1MB hard size limit
=
* 900kB soft limit

S =3D block size
<= div>U =3D UTXO_adjusted_size =3D S + 4 * outputs - 3 * inputs

=
A block is valid if S < 1MB and U < 1MB

A 250 = byte transaction with 2 inputs and 2 outputs would have an adjusted size of= 252 bytes.

The memory pool could be sorted by= fee per adjusted_size.=C2=A0

=C2=A0Coin sele= ction could be adjusted so it tries to have at least 2 inputs when creating= transactions, unless the input is worth more than a threshold (say 0.001 B= TC).

This is a pretty weak incentive, especially if the b= lock size is increased.=C2=A0 Maybe it will cause a "nudge"
--001a11c07daadf72520515f44664--