Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QpAfv-0001LX-VS for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 03:02:15 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1QpAfr-00051b-1P for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 03:02:15 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-67-77-87-241.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [67.77.87.241]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3E52560513; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 03:01:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: Jeff Garzik Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 23:01:47 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo; KDE/4.6.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <201108041629.04130.luke@dashjr.org> In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201108042301.49990.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1QpAfr-00051b-1P Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Useful bitcoin patches... X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 03:02:16 -0000 On Thursday, August 04, 2011 7:43:56 PM Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> bugfix_CreateThread_leak > > Did I leave something out, when merging > > commit 67ed7d9d4929d8fe1c5f976c184c72dff02d83b7 > Author: JoelKatz > Date: Mon Jul 25 15:06:45 2011 -0700 > > ? Yes. I'm not sure it has any practical impact on the software, but there was what looks like a platform-specific compile fix (casting between potentially incompatible types) too.