Return-Path: <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55249E0D
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:44:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f172.google.com (mail-io0-f172.google.com
	[209.85.223.172])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D44868A
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:44:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 1so153364598ion.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 06:44:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc
	:content-type; bh=OdcbhHBUKNMLI668QD5449VImvJpnCzSIHbe2kXj0RQ=;
	b=iIs9TiNcPy29j/TfCgzuZgBpsTLDoejWcscpLI87dXkukfi+nsx4lolDSPelmtb5B4
	U2EElaM1CdmYvokWZnx941pDc6nPBQQbYoz2zue1ZcJSt/sSyOPCnyD27U4KTGPUXegK
	0QLG8q8Hake20rXGjbpSOiY4z9XY3aD6tPdqg//FrGmh+4cG+yeykilSiueq6nHvfQa/
	3/NFin64CWA7xJ8RTk+ZJLzkRFFuN+VCQzKGIdNrfljrGr2DTfchnbdodVkU7NRTHzug
	j8fq5a47RsccTBErgI3Awa18wfvQi7ItPtoYNPT4J94E5mfOXwTzYXvTJBL3QDVLf5MQ
	bGsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type;
	bh=OdcbhHBUKNMLI668QD5449VImvJpnCzSIHbe2kXj0RQ=;
	b=PpZw2p45DkYs2Q1uB8pUdPLuFGRQ2UacYi0ZMXOMTMlRWaI7J4yvoaFEbLxi8JgB/f
	kcv/z9TYMXkTU2/Sna0bU6a/tLlDjYggwJmT6Unug/9jil49uez3poQatlSQzFccT4GU
	JXC1Fa+SgW9QD2KlTuluRLHltPRc0Ah9VCgkepIMlF3VOEnLoWCIi4lt9G++H97WzCMn
	NtEd+Q9oe6l3lDDmMuHB0l9t9Kmzxqw/7O/YsjsuUCL46dRHK2eGjZy+bR5C6gyOOop/
	kz6YfYMqwIoH/SfidiD7Pnt/PvRchBqR8Fk6ahnBkeOY0uPZaidW7iHTm3epIGVQ7nrt
	zE3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT5yY2qclTL1wj6WkxMaOq76RFhq+KQvTBGOk6uod38KCeTK+Cia1vWRqDmE6XJV1Peu0md8CS7kCHQ2w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.154.79 with SMTP id c76mr16367469ioe.53.1453733048274;
	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 06:44:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.90.7 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 06:44:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2815165.aykQg88K5r@1337h4x0r>
References: <20160117100808.GA4299@amethyst.visucore.com>
	<1591452.8UA7xN1qih@1337h4x0r>
	<20160125120317.GB17769@amethyst.visucore.com>
	<2815165.aykQg88K5r@1337h4x0r>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:44:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKJqnrGq41ZvGByfH53n1=wJtPZghk+zyNOwZX8RXbJWcr=Xog@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marco Falke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, MISSING_HEADERS,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:05:11 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release candidate 1 available
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:44:09 -0000

All of this is already implemented in the bitcoind and bitcoin gui.

The theoretic minimum for the prune target would be 0 (just the header
of the current best block) as Bitcoin Core already stores the
chainstate (about 2 GiB) regardless of what you set for -prune=<N>.

In practice, the minimum is 510, so reorgs and small rescans (may not
be implemented in 0.12) are still possible.

The clients won't let you set it below that target:
"Prune configured below the minimum of 550 MiB. Please use a higher number."

Also, keep in mind Bitcoin Core comes with a help message explaining
-prune and other command line options

--Marco

2016-01-25 13:27 GMT+01:00 xor--- via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>:
> On Monday, January 25, 2016 01:03:17 PM Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote:
>> > If yes, I would highly recommend advertising it in the new release notes -
>> > as said, the disk space reduction is a big deal.
>>
>> Good idea, has been added by Marco Falke in commit fa31133,
>
> Thanks. The RC2 changelog now says:
>
>> To enable block pruning set prune=<N> on the command line or in
>> bitcoin.conf, where N is the number of MiB to allot for raw block & undo
>> data.
>
> From having read the Bitcoin whitepaper quite a few months ago ago, I have the
> very very basic understanding that pruning is meant to:
> - delete old transaction data which merely "moves coins around"
> - instead only store the "origin" (= block where coins were mined) and
> "current location" of the coins, i.e. the unspent transactions. Notably, I
> understood it as "this is as secure as storing everything, since we know where
> the coins were created, and where they are".
>
> So from that point of view, I would assume that there is a "natural" amount of
> megabytes which a fully pruned blockchain consists of: It would be defined by
> the final amount of unspent coins.
> I thereby am confused why it is possible to configure a number of megabytes
> "to allot for raw block & undo data". I would rather expect pruning just to be
> a boolean on/off flag, and the number of megabytes to be an automatically
> computed result from the natural size of the dataset.
> And especially, I fear that I could set N too low, and as a result, it would
> delete "too much". I mean could this result in even security relevant
> transaction data being deleted?
>
> Thus, it would be nice if you could yet once more edit the release notes to:
> - explain why a N must be given
> - what a "safe" value of N is. I.e. how large must N be at least to not delete
> security-relevant stuff?
> - maybe mention if there is a "auto" setting for N to ensure that it choses a
> safe value on its own?
>
> Sorry if my descriptions are from a layman's point of view. I intentionally
> did *not* re-read the Bitcoin whitepaper to have a better understanding:
> I think having a layman's understanding is a good usability test for such
> stuff.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>