From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Angel Leon <gubatron@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:27:51 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.9-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
References: <201511132228.47815.luke@dashjr.org>
	<201511142111.24046.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CADZB0_Z3Kf4GW0VATjb10kJF0aFgyFOcqX_=y+LFoUpsi+TRUA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADZB0_Z3Kf4GW0VATjb10kJF0aFgyFOcqX_=y+LFoUpsi+TRUA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201511142127.53255.luke@dashjr.org>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	John Sacco <johnsock@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Block size doubles at each reward halving
	with max block size of 32M
Precedence: list

On Saturday, November 14, 2015 9:15:07 PM Angel Leon wrote:
> "the economy does not necessarily include miners"
> so the money supply isn't part of the economy?

Not in the context of economic majority deciding hardforks. After all, the 
outcome of the hardfork *determines* the money supply. So the former money 
supply not supporting the change would just mean they cease to be involved in 
that capacity. But even aside from that, the more relevant factor in terms of 
economic involvement is /acceptance/ of bitcoins as payment for real goods.

Luke