Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WH20x-00048E-2l for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 02:08:27 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com designates 74.125.82.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.47; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com; helo=mail-wg0-f47.google.com; Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WH20w-0004oO-0N for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 02:08:27 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id k14so3050323wgh.2 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:08:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=B28jAUtLL1XX+iDowfz/HyJqB4nR4rtIyk/0pEo22yU=; b=BwSeNJ5kUlu0O35SbKS7I2V59cmyq0BBtWSMIZidDHX+M301596ooFzcaROHe2Pq60 9ZF++rNNQd/QublTJVVu5gQ5vvpyqzwls+b8K1cyHO8/4+mueSuFAaRsYikTW2ocA2Zl Q9HcRfpdT4YOIlBFTxtxRH8TXRoBY6l9W7zER/kAcKXvUG7HkJQWYumcTXLHH3yiBX3M 9tRHEmi0VlQEbPr0QcOn3STxT6GnsVEPZk2s8P6O/YXGcQ+7SIuLpb58+xwkJOtRiDI7 nV7RAJzy4LFgK+hFuyo6/M6NVmZMiBxQD2wEpg1s9zNLtf8avOW8r8rNpIRRFNnWh4rh kVsg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkcqwbN3gWuvYboLdQ8xAl7vs2f95Dd9myvXGs5XzdMwwjCGBcGgM9K8EqAOYcdSqBmhaJx MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.195.12.200 with SMTP id es8mr9528749wjd.77.1393034899579; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:08:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.82.197 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:08:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1393031052.6897.89.camel@staypuft> References: <1393031052.6897.89.camel@staypuft> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:08:19 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeff Garzik To: "Dustin D. Trammell" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WH20w-0004oO-0N Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core trial balloon: splitting blockchain engine and wallet X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 02:08:27 -0000 On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Dustin D. Trammell wrote: > For those of us that prefer the reference software and also manage > multiple wallets, having to store a copy of the blockchain for each one > eats up disk space quite quickly. If I could run a local blockchain > server (or a local network one, even) and then have whichever wallet I > start up use that instead of maintain its own copy of the blockchain, my > world would be much, much happier. You mean running multiple wallets simultaneously? Agreed. Multiple wallets, used serially, works fine today. I manage multiple wallets using symlink replacement. -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/