Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 317FE86 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 18:15:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.132.66]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 848B5224 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 18:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [37.143.74.116] (helo=[192.168.2.15]); authenticated by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1ZR2Su-0002qo-6q; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 20:15:28 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6C94498D-F561-4FC9-91D6-E0497CF7FDA1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5 From: Tamas Blummer In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 20:15:26 +0200 Message-Id: <0C02000B-C8D5-4206-9BFB-BE0307B4FFAF@bitsofproof.com> References: <942BCFCD-5016-4523-AB7D-241F9E4DD0B1@bitsofproof.com> To: Adam Back X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1439748930; df910d26; X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT 0.11A X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 18:15:31 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_6C94498D-F561-4FC9-91D6-E0497CF7FDA1 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B545009B-9E33-4388-BE82-E7247FB7A868" --Apple-Mail=_B545009B-9E33-4388-BE82-E7247FB7A868 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi Adam, I welcomed XT for its declared focus on usability with current means. I think there is also more room for non-consenus relevant P2P protocol = flavors than a single code base can accommodate. XT is also as Jeff just tweeted a relief valve. It became important, that Bitcoin is able to evolve even if there are = conflicting educated opinions. If a review process serves decision making, then I=E2=80=99d be glad to = participate. Tamas Blummer > On Aug 16, 2015, at 19:01, Adam Back wrote: >=20 > Hi Tamas >=20 > Do you find BIP 101, BIP 102, BIP 103 and the flexcap proposal > deserving of equal consideration? Just curious because of your post. >=20 > Will you be interested to participate in the BIP review process and > perhaps attend the workshop on Bitcoin scaling announced here > recently? >=20 > Adam >=20 > On 16 August 2015 at 17:07, Tamas Blummer via bitcoin-dev > wrote: >> Being a bitcoin software developer an entrepreneur for years I = learned that success is not a direct consequence of technology and is = not inevitable. >> BitcoinXT manifesto = (https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt#the-xt-manifesto) should = resonate with many fellow entrepreneurs. >> I applaud Mike and Gavin for creating that choice for us. >>=20 >> Tamas Blummer >>=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> bitcoin-dev mailing list >> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >>=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_B545009B-9E33-4388-BE82-E7247FB7A868 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Hi Adam,

I welcomed XT for its declared focus on = usability with current means. 
I think there = is also more room for non-consenus relevant P2P protocol flavors than a = single code base can accommodate.
XT is also as = Jeff just tweeted a relief valve.

It became important, that Bitcoin is = able to evolve even if there are conflicting educated = opinions.
If a review process serves decision = making, then I=E2=80=99d be glad to participate.

Tamas Blummer

On Aug 16, 2015, at 19:01, Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org> wrote:

Hi Tamas

Do you find BIP 101, BIP 102, BIP 103 and the = flexcap proposal
deserving of equal consideration? =  Just curious because of your post.

Will= you be interested to participate in the BIP review process and
perhaps attend the workshop on Bitcoin scaling announced = here
recently?

Adam

On 16 August 2015 at 17:07, Tamas Blummer via = bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Being a bitcoin software = developer an entrepreneur for years I learned that success is not a = direct consequence of technology and is not inevitable.
BitcoinXT manifesto (https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt#the-xt-manifesto) = should resonate with many fellow entrepreneurs.
I applaud = Mike and Gavin for creating that choice for us.

Tamas Blummer


_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev<= br class=3D"">


= --Apple-Mail=_B545009B-9E33-4388-BE82-E7247FB7A868-- --Apple-Mail=_6C94498D-F561-4FC9-91D6-E0497CF7FDA1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJV0NM+AAoJEPZykcUXcTkcHKMH/3mdHshWw8x5IHdWnuGnYSPR yq56ZkY3JOVkWP9IfPm9vb2/iwPQ0nriZeIYIvCQHNgYzsx6FAKBcMO+GmVZSH8j 0ANi808AElN5b2XBecbqiRJrvKKhL41TZsmIBYoH/gHQWGrmhlHr43XokKycJJyN gxB1BXlmTS1WoZ4lb+Ggo9eD0WGHsG03UBfmuxDdNaS4ivSXzqRBBah/4LA6YREP BZpG1N/0V8yxZtR3IHZ8oQ3jFXFIPPAsEt0qwaqIagKOCm0jBrQ0LyJHMRWIWbVc qlEavv3x4WHtHyt36yQijYVI29QzgHeAdXyu4hQxs8nVEJXoohvTHE0xKTEmd5s= =lF6+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_6C94498D-F561-4FC9-91D6-E0497CF7FDA1--