MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDq-FKwAO+7sJdFR9sLND=gy5OrnyU+UQEtDxnoMn+BH-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADm_WcZKoMAhYvXbFMbE+5K9HOD75YkQu8_qTW4S6YN6ZMrfjA@mail.gmail.com>
	<201507172029.17056.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CAE-z3OWZdi2K6k-J063pqUgbBep0ELuZ1rm83wR5ox=kZ8CUQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDq-FKwAO+7sJdFR9sLND=gy5OrnyU+UQEtDxnoMn+BH-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:24:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDpTHejpj-X50U1nfHgWTvLzw6Ar59keNoHdGSFMtQG_7g@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 102 - kick the can down the road to 2MB
Precedence: list

Sorry...
More specifically, how many people made it to
https://github.com/jtimon/bips/blob/bip-forks/bip-forks.org#uncontroversial=
-hardforks

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrote=
:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hardforks are not something where voting makes sense. They need consens=
us
>>> among /nodes/, not majority among /miners/. No hardfork has ever had su=
ch
>>> a
>>> vote.
>>
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> I meant that since some of the new hard fork proposals use a voting syst=
em
>> for activation, they may not want to establish that precedent.
>
> I wonder how many people read
> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/008936.h=
tml
> apart from you...