Return-Path: <rusty@ozlabs.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D9682C
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:02:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA15EA6
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:02:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1011)
	id 3A1AB140319; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:02:54 +1100 (AEDT)
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>,
	Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>, Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <eme59eddfb-c410-4af4-b496-e3301ac9db85@platinum>
References: <eme59eddfb-c410-4af4-b496-e3301ac9db85@platinum>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:32:45 +1030
Message-ID: <87ziy0qeca.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Alternative name for CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY (BIP112)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:02:56 -0000

Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> writes:
>>From an app developer's perspective, I think it is pretty blatantly 
> clear that relative timelock is *the* critical exposed functionality 
> intended here.

As someone who actually developed scripts using CSV, I agree with Mark
(and Matt).  The relative locktime stuff isn't in this opcode, it's in
the nSequence calculation.

So, I vote to keep CSV called as it is.

Thanks,
Rusty.