Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SjnuJ-0004kX-Rk for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:47:29 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.212.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.181; envelope-from=andyparkins@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f181.google.com; Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1SjnuE-0005Dg-IC for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:47:27 +0000 Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so650905wib.10 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 01:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.78.161 with SMTP id c1mr2903039wix.1.1340786836411; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 01:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dvr.localnet (mail.360visiontechnology.com. [92.42.121.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gv7sm9264087wib.4.2012.06.27.01.47.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Jun 2012 01:47:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Andy Parkins To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:47:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.0.0-1-686-pae; KDE/4.8.3; i686; ; ) References: <20120626141129.GA30240@vps7135.xlshosting.net> In-Reply-To: <20120626141129.GA30240@vps7135.xlshosting.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart11392621.b7l24eJfaS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201206270947.07921.andyparkins@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (andyparkins[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1SjnuE-0005Dg-IC Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Tor hidden service support X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:47:29 -0000 --nextPart11392621.b7l24eJfaS Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012 June 26 Tuesday, Pieter Wuille wrote: > Additionally, such addresses are exchanged and relayed via the P2P networ= k. > To do so, we reused the fd87:d87e:eb43::/48 IPv6 range. Each address in Yuck. Can't we pinch a few of the addr.services bits to store an address=20 family? AF_INET, AF_INET6, AF_CUSTOM_TOR, and leave space for a few more=20 would be, say, four bits out of 64 mostly unused. Andy =2D-=20 Dr Andy Parkins andyparkins@gmail.com --nextPart11392621.b7l24eJfaS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk/qyIUACgkQwQJ9gE9xL23hTwCgt+AQWxbkjlp2hNtTLo1W1kjL tCoAn1t0HfGuQnr27T/o7F73Av5BMzyX =e3Dj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart11392621.b7l24eJfaS--