From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:04:25 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <59fad2b6-9b15-ffec-116e-91d27ce29f80@mattcorallo.com>
	<qh2qj1$7sg4$1@blaine.gmane.org> <qh76ln$41ag$1@blaine.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <qh76ln$41ag$1@blaine.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <201907250304.27179.luke@dashjr.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core to disable Bloom-based Filtering by
	default
Precedence: list

On Tuesday 23 July 2019 14:47:18 Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > the DNS seed infrastructure among others can easily direct
> > wallets to those nodes
>
> Last I checked none of the seeds did. But I agree this would be nice to
> have.

It's supported by default in sipa's bitcoin-seeder, which many DNS seeds us=
e.

My seed also currently requires NODE_BLOOM for *any* answers returned.
(But I don't guarantee that will remain forever.)

> As a side note, Coinbase just announced their 30M'th wallet. I'm
> convinced this massive run into custodial wallets...

Light wallets are just as bad for the network as custodial wallets.

> IMHO, BIP 37 is the only scaling technology that has proven successful and
> could =E2=80=93 if supported and improved rather than choked =E2=80=93 co=
ntinue to help
> holding against the bitbanks trend.

Light wallets are not Bitcoin scaling. They are just trusting anonymous 3rd=
=20
parties, which is harmful to Bitcoin.

Luke