Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <laanwj@gmail.com>) id 1XiJqn-0002xG-BB
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:11:01 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.213.181 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.213.181; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ig0-f181.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com ([209.85.213.181])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1XiJqm-0000rd-9p
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:11:01 +0000
Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id l13so3897703iga.14
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sun, 26 Oct 2014 02:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.10.82 with SMTP id u79mr1196988ioi.46.1414314654984;
	Sun, 26 Oct 2014 02:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.249.170 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 02:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <544CB6F2.4000200@riseup.net>
References: <CA+s+GJA3-qK71TcUCYQ3xOdi+zgE_fB9N6NJkNBUDtWnA-0dcA@mail.gmail.com>
	<544CB6F2.4000200@riseup.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:10:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+s+GJANOtiqt1ypkZZeTQX=2k+y=F8uZhLJ69=6Li1GLhmYkQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: odinn <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(laanwj[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1XiJqm-0000rd-9p
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10 release schedule
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:11:01 -0000

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:55 AM, odinn <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Q., re. transaction fee changes / txconfirmtarget described at
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/c8a25189bcb1381eddf46b9a9743ba48e929439e/doc/release-notes.md
>
> (for Core 0.10)
>
> ~ does this include the floating fees for 0.10 as described at
> https://bitcoinfoundation.org/2014/07/floating-fees-for-0-10/ ?
>
> thanks in advance for clarifications

Yes, floating/smart fees has been merged a while ago

- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3959
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/4250

Wladimir