MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgR4iGshOgsammWQ93yD0GsckUgroX-sb7mDE7XuQb5k3g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAS2fgR4iGshOgsammWQ93yD0GsckUgroX-sb7mDE7XuQb5k3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marco Pontello <marcopon@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 02:17:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAE0pACJ0nihnwXKovQ4mJb6+ctNdzfPu_RE=y1ThmyqCZd-8gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d10047c9663051ee0d54f
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed minor change to BIP 01 to use a PR for
 request assignment
Precedence: list

--089e013d10047c9663051ee0d54f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

None that I can see.
In fact I was just about to ask for some details about this part of the
process, so this come just at the right time.

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> The process in BIP01 was written when we used a different solution for
> storing and presenting BIPs.
>
> I'm thinking of suggesting that the number request process be changed
> to opening a pull req with BIP text with no number (e.g. just using
> the authors name and an index as the number) as the mechenism to
> request number assignment.
>
> Is there any reason that anyone would find this objectionable?
>
> (Please do not respond to this message with anything but a strictly
> directed answer to that question, start a new thread for a different
> subject. Thanks!)
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>


-- 
Try the Online TrID File Identifier
http://mark0.net/onlinetrid.aspx

--089e013d10047c9663051ee0d54f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">None that I can see.<div>In fact I was just about to ask f=
or some details about this part of the process, so this come just at the ri=
ght time.</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <span d=
ir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" tar=
get=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<=
br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left=
:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">The process in BIP01 was written when we =
used a different solution for<br>
storing and presenting BIPs.<br>
<br>
I&#39;m thinking of suggesting that the number request process be changed<b=
r>
to opening a pull req with BIP text with no number (e.g. just using<br>
the authors name and an index as the number) as the mechenism to<br>
request number assignment.<br>
<br>
Is there any reason that anyone would find this objectionable?<br>
<br>
(Please do not respond to this message with anything but a strictly<br>
directed answer to that question, start a new thread for a different<br>
subject. Thanks!)<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class=
=3D"gmail_signature">Try the Online TrID File Identifier<br><a href=3D"http=
://mark0.net/onlinetrid.aspx" target=3D"_blank">http://mark0.net/onlinetrid=
.aspx</a></div>
</div>

--089e013d10047c9663051ee0d54f--