Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3E5C0032 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A42760742 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:38:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 5A42760742 Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=YUtjsoh2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.848 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cmicLwDccJKd for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:38:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 269FE605BE Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 269FE605BE for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id o12so51168089edb.9 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:38:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678725517; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UfErkCDB+lkxNsukE8mbvKhymJid7qpnAcYhrVMq+fc=; b=YUtjsoh25kQyWNRIxc0cjxDxEm0i2NToY3KA5SWudpXqz8CpRVd8QVgNxMcsxOfGri LDD8jGQGwyTv0ESpndS7lK36AXMxWMXA03qEAqruJFlqDDXwpTBwob+zv9VJ0jDQ3MDg OpGCV1COP/i+bebkldO6pI5zNweYa8+iLGLOzPUgjlpkHHOQAvGlyjf4KObZKqoOjdhw uxLJD7qJL+xtW1zls+ZPI04r3sg9Cv4wn8dK7qFGBwZlYNiR9eUEKYJhveJmvoGG3863 TtsC2prgc80P81o1iejuPg8wfL6EM4JisK7UHTVQUnC+Zekz60ipmKosyJU/+EWR2pzj tU+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678725517; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=UfErkCDB+lkxNsukE8mbvKhymJid7qpnAcYhrVMq+fc=; b=m1aqkA5e2V8+aW4WmOvWiec1z4GDHvSpYXWutbFC2KR6lO7R4mdpMtLQpTl6Vnv6Qf YoJ+LQUNjCCEcmWvHRHt4Wmi/V5SldqcbWRjPp5kmdar1Uvwx9tjdXk1P6iTdGS7JA/L OpUliyIbfo2ivqaDjMPkCx3oPQQT94bZw8kL6WqaLjyKhr/pMF78F8uhIrXycCVZJyIf YiCrSHMusjGnFozFF3gaufGPXQlQc/xVVATIMY8ja7p2CDe9DDg81kowjR3yVBFdy+1I 4fxdJ9bT8jwYsluMpaMIGJIEVMmSGBrfGt6z6QGgyTnS4PWJQDQKH1UbEDMkJ6SogTVn OXpw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKV7cB74oV0ppYQRTV7QZCp4m5oBBvuyLVi6xLF0Htka5lR8HEM/ sXMPpt+99x786fRBL0akCmZSNUMfaXxwQ6ISC5tXdUUNx4c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/vaTz2euSy/Xo5maa01Ww5T3cDdb+S2Jn8eqhfTyuYziT0uQRox4/QNM9m7mL6nE7dhNIkg6/NBjyOoCVaik4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a05a:b0:8b2:23fb:dfd1 with SMTP id bg26-20020a170906a05a00b008b223fbdfd1mr18474151ejb.2.1678725517094; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:38:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Greg Sanders Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 12:38:25 -0400 Message-ID: To: Peter Todd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001f31c205f6cabead" Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ephemeral Anchors: Fixing V3 Package RBF againstpackage limit pinning X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:38:40 -0000 --0000000000001f31c205f6cabead Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable After getting neutral to negative feedback on the choice, I have switched to OP_TRUE on the BIP and implementation. Cheers, Greg On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 11:03=E2=80=AFAM Peter Todd wro= te: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:07:29PM -0500, Greg Sanders wrote: > > I'm not particularly persuaded, but also not wedded to either idea. > > > > Fixed up tests for the OP_TRUE case here: > > https://github.com/instagibbs/bitcoin/tree/ephemeral-anchors-true > > Thanks. > > Looking through that, I think a lot of those test cases don't actually > need to > be changed to OP_2, as they aren't trying to test anything related to > standardness. > > -- > https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org > --0000000000001f31c205f6cabead Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
After getting neutral to negative feedback on the choice, = I have switched to OP_TRUE on the BIP and implementation.

Cheers,
Greg

On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 11:03=E2=80=AFAM Peter= Todd <pete@petertodd.org> = wrote:
On Fri, F= eb 03, 2023 at 09:07:29PM -0500, Greg Sanders wrote:
> I'm not particularly persuaded, but also not wedded to either idea= .
>
> Fixed up tests for the OP_TRUE case here:
> https://github.com/instagibbs/= bitcoin/tree/ephemeral-anchors-true

Thanks.

Looking through that, I think a lot of those test cases don't actually = need to
be changed to OP_2, as they aren't trying to test anything related to standardness.

--
http= s://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--0000000000001f31c205f6cabead--