Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_6E41DA65-2CB9-486B-91EA-96D59EBEB87C";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
From: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <29363BE6-72A7-4D06-A974-C52BA12FD8BD@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:38:15 -0700
Message-Id: <D83751B4-5A01-458D-A7F1-92F9CF2C8467@gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBgs-ouEMu=LOVCmOyCGwfM1Ygxooz0shyvAuHDGGZYfJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBgugLSVEwDLXhgey86_rM2fTjGWXFuXsiZioJKCZiHiNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADm_WcbnQQGZoQ92twfUvbzqGwu__xLn+BYOkHPZY_YT1pFrbA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPWm=eW8RgrG1CMEAMN4GeiMjZecFvNtZB_Y4rZNeofWSD0=Wg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADm_WcYCUHs9Qe_T6WJOCUSK6stXYD8v6z5JcGHfRMURoOSFTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDq3JyZx0QCRDbcNSLSOBKdpi4h_7VN1XL8N42U38+eBAA@mail.gmail.com>
	<55B113AF.40500@thinlink.com>
	<CABsx9T1MTc-GmuQyFN1vaFK=CDWV_L214Pi9nR6jLMouQQD0fw@mail.gmail.com>
	<C5A70F53-4779-457A-A06A-686877706F89@gmail.com>
	<CADL_X_exckh5T2BfzPEp26fPR3TD69QarwroDEdS_9wtnKbf+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<6F436293-9E2B-461C-B105-FC4CF9EBFC69@gmail.com>
	<CADL_X_fs3-Zj-9nHu5HXCS=kNFUTJkrUR_8SL+d+M4ziwB66Jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDqFe+_g5Mk=tXCD94x74pu6SiL+XHhMM-T3bBw78m3Mow@mail.gmail.com>
	<D161F6BB-BFB1-4B9F-B024-D60A170F393C@gmail.com>
	<CALqmWPC8PdSPS3chhnjBaTixrvvg0VrEaXzd3OvbXifkMs0DUw@mail.gmail.com>
	<42BF7FEB-320F-43BE-B3D9-1D76CB8B9975@gmai> <l.com@mac.com>
	<D472C05D-7164-4ED1-B571-94415AD8E60F@gmail.com>
	<346D4CE0-E00D-4ABB-B131-EFA1416CB20C@me.com>
	<29363BE6-72A7-4D06-A974-C52BA12FD8BD@gmail.com>
To: Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core and hard forks
Precedence: list


--Apple-Mail=_6E41DA65-2CB9-486B-91EA-96D59EBEB87C
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8

Are you referring to mining contracts?

> On Jul 23, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
>=20
>> On Jul 23, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman =
<jeanpaulkogelman@me.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> You are not going to get a fair fee market if your only form of =
enforcement is the threat of exclusion.
>>=20
>> A more fair fee market will develop if miners start offering quality =
of service, preferably at multiple tiers. At that point any interference =
from a block size cap will only be detrimental. In fact it will only =
highlight what the cap is actually for; to prevent monster blocks.
>>=20
>> Add better QoS tools for miners and extend the cap (when possible) =
and there's your fee market.
>>=20
>> jp
>=20
> Not sure what you mean by QoS here. Either your transaction is =
included or it isn=E2=80=99t. It=E2=80=99s not like you can upgrade to a =
master suite with a view or anything.


--Apple-Mail=_6E41DA65-2CB9-486B-91EA-96D59EBEB87C
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVsYj3AAoJEJNAI64YFENUQQIP/0Z+ca7potmxlRvZqg9VRRP0
7AFqQNhxScntaMMDfX7N+nYtLjFckJfgFJZEGTeQHCJWQ8b63VQrI1CTn3yOXV57
i9t6IHaPIoeLPYkHZbKxuahrmhYN+QuCVRmAJS9ejxYlKwqCHkKZK3mIAfjMqZ4C
T5zAD59zewVw4QQY894OAEWBIjfkEPfmphP+CmuoYxt2Ty2zdvQ5GtpMDnPwfATV
PvY6XVUracdW0f2olqRFxoDP0SULvMhIqEgMc2iNdJRtxC8R3bJETEJy32zbSpWJ
HoB16Yxy5A72D59CO9nTD0WCftv3pjNW1Qd9/TqDbyLh4Y/cLzYhgRGJeDMOyGzg
U/+zQi4USa3BG4/V7RR60WRqyGEdWIWN1gP9jxOkQAP8fsqWvnElQ1fXRejqpNXP
nrFDehR1ff47oYbAbGhCVqpCM8ntDfxTmcl6PdU+/oxHBILobkp6Jr2AmqQkqvdu
7zqB7P9zMuIm4XM004180Z2TOfvOsC2iVKVK3EBM3nUswmthhsi2qZSftePBfZRL
iudHqWZnFp5bypw7uaPDdTQt3+h1562fQ/aJdihOlDxwG8xSehuHm13KLXpMd9LK
ZFCHELQhdoTdX1nr2mz+uTJdnyGEYKNjHtYNmvcZfSqCs4U9VZfRDynHh5VIW0tf
R4oSJrtF7KunhAILPhvZ
=uHLQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_6E41DA65-2CB9-486B-91EA-96D59EBEB87C--