Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YIII7-0008Nv-QK for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:47:55 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=vv01f@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net; Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1YIII6-0000HE-Kg for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:47:55 +0000 Received: from plantcutter.riseup.net (plantcutter-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C174C40F79 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 14:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: vv01f) with ESMTPSA id 1BB852007D Message-ID: <54CF8E10.5040402@riseup.net> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:47:44 +0100 From: vv01f User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131005 Icedove/17.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net References: <54CF74A5.3050304@gk2.sk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=AD26D9FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at mx1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [198.252.153.129 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Headers-End: 1YIII6-0000HE-Kg Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:47:55 -0000 On 02.02.2015 15:17, Andreas Schildbach wrote: >> Uff, I would expect YYYYMMDD there so it's human readable as well. > > Those strings are not meant to be read by humans. YYYYMMDD is more > complicated than necessary, given that Bitcoin deals with seconds since > epoch everywhere. First that is a pitty .. as its simply a waste of storage. but back to Pavol's point: IMHO no harm to anything, as Bitcoin never has any valid timestamp below ~1230768000 (jan2009) and thus will always have 10 digits.. you can easily identify 8 char long timestamp as the proposed format. And there never is anything wrong with having a transparent, human readable option - especially when it saves 2 bytes in e.g. qr-codes.