Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VhBqZ-00077w-TK for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 05:21:35 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.66]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1VhBqY-0007tf-3U for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 05:21:35 +0000 Received: from [37.143.74.116] (helo=[192.168.2.2]); authenticated by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1VhBqR-0004Ys-7c; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 06:21:27 +0100 From: Tamas Blummer Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B7E8F87C-B5BE-4169-92B4-D1E9F4C6CCFD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Message-Id: <4FEB4B8B-7F96-470E-8129-5ECB3382DEEB@bitsofproof.com> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 06:21:26 +0100 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1384492894; efa2073b; X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: bitsofproof.com] X-Headers-End: 1VhBqY-0007tf-3U Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] moving the default display to mbtc X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 05:21:36 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_B7E8F87C-B5BE-4169-92B4-D1E9F4C6CCFD Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi Jeff, such a vote is up there since March: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D149150.0 Votes are in favor of it. Advantages are obvious: 1. having satoshi as 1/100 of the main unit is familiar to people like = USD and cent 2. All existing financial software can deal/store big numbers but = typically only 2 decimals. 3. Split could be linked with the introduction of the ISO code in one = step. Lets get it finally done. On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:05:06 -0500 Jeff Garzik = wrote: > would suggest posting on all possible forums "proposal: switch to >uBTC, labelled as ISO prefers (XBT?)" and see what sort of discussion >is generated. If the support is broad, it will be plain from the >responses if there is a consensus. Perhaps everyone will agree it is >the best course, and we can make an easy change. > >But we need less "core dev fiat" not more :) > >--=20 >Jeff Garzik >Senior Software Engineer and open source evangelist >BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ Regards, Tam=E1s Blummer Founder, CEO http://bitsofproof.com --Apple-Mail=_B7E8F87C-B5BE-4169-92B4-D1E9F4C6CCFD Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSha9WAAoJEPZykcUXcTkcuRAIAImChaAxCQPzfBu9SjOJM8cS OH5SI0GWqe067W5JEMXkqFZcrfb603WzV6GhHD3ECjgnz2p2P4ac9JfHWW6ZWdIv rmvNFRErh39usF1iPCu+g5JR1qm1WsT/evM6TwCrymtyhxcLSIX7gbUN5ykIgyg2 Wy1K20UhBFOXckOsiDrguOcQ+Kz2TgWps7v2mXaesWU7tii//LeA643Af6lou4yO 5F6oR8RSMFxUe4iCtoN+ie8CCG4j2uL6DB+2A2+0QQV8e3jth2w2/wWZWVj6Qx// TOLiPfmHLkXVSBejeH2fS/7jpXse6u2YHPEneBdURJgTVRwB2SeIapn6PzOELlA= =l1T/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_B7E8F87C-B5BE-4169-92B4-D1E9F4C6CCFD--