Return-Path: <voisine@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9323C78D
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 18 Jun 2016 06:07:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lf0-f45.google.com (mail-lf0-f45.google.com
	[209.85.215.45])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 724B9A1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 18 Jun 2016 06:07:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-f45.google.com with SMTP id q132so9827188lfe.3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; 
	bh=mujtsPoWlbQeQ6Hhqyu8fTcBoHFxdi+qDgtILUVcI38=;
	b=QLAG5o/xOP4TYsgX4iIJ/XeH+Gl8E1RmcG++ZDcRitW7aelLR0Ux4uPcdxcioj5qWe
	ThJo/8wwJmXO7Ck/EfDEUlYlr3mtZlZtaLd+vYHEVQFdRFg0b/9WQqnGCK+j+vxGeFXE
	zWjXQ9Cy9AVjv7DA35+qH012GfsBbPKuiJwbL590o5t0f0izDs0M0pA+l9hc8/k5z1Fx
	dooOXVN4dcH1aODUo2rZ0c6wAbZU1xSubblSpajftetLiTxARLE5Tv+wXiZgFnB/DHHw
	mVK0lfzHeKDTerGRLQkVKT5I+Fdx0RfVk6sqLAvlpLFcr4l9Kh+rLZ4byrByPthDu8eI
	0Arg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=mujtsPoWlbQeQ6Hhqyu8fTcBoHFxdi+qDgtILUVcI38=;
	b=c+/oWYbO7ASE3i0yxqoQ/1eCsPUCpTe/17f06GZFTa/U0S1iTyh6CZ8Ep1sVHsEZbW
	DI1+2vagpvpqapeoVvb6d5aA9HOwyneMi67+Ari1tOBzPq0pCx2xZzMZL3FK/zh2Gnwe
	0Id5NRwdBD5AK1i/Yny8GnZWKqKqCGzrZzZ0G8hqCA3sKuKajJRgN7z8ktnnIGhbCozu
	Zkg7Zi5TZuCJeupCOVhP1TA7lFEu5rIuT34LSf85QSlaysLMuf4iNAuxnDDjHyAHNsqI
	tR3urUurKwW+MI4CokiSGi0LkJ6n4GvphP30MBrNlPFgRzolznllCSLZy+G0M8ThNQaG
	9Olw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL73QJloH67TCybkxWl8/ZO95ARwB1N9n0aRxx6RXgOtSiUbQqxvwOiAx6HsRqDoMVUpmsyE+ND2yK2DA==
X-Received: by 10.25.83.15 with SMTP id h15mr1324099lfb.81.1466230069507; Fri,
	17 Jun 2016 23:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.26.72 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5760259B.7040409@mycelium.com>
References: <5760259B.7040409@mycelium.com>
From: Aaron Voisine <voisine@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:07:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CACq0ZD4EWNxmsbz4pUv30ZPS9O+paMNzqvaHpL6uZ5tF-up4iQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Weigl <Daniel.Weigl@mycelium.com>, 
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140683e73bd4b0535874afc
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RFC for BIP: Derivation scheme for
 P2WPKH-nested-in-P2SH based accounts
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 06:07:52 -0000

--001a1140683e73bd4b0535874afc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

This works for segwit version 1 with the addition of also using a different
chain id.

I presume that segwit version 2 will be implementing schnorr signatures.
What do we know about the likely implementation details? Is there any way
to avoid using a third derivation path to support it?


Aaron Voisine
co-founder and CEO
breadwallet <http://breadwallet.com>

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Daniel Weigl via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Hi List,
>
> Following up to the discussion last month (
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-May/012695.html
> ), ive prepared a proposal for a BIP here:
>
>
> https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediawiki
>
>
> Any comments on it? Does anyone working on a BIP44 compliant wallet
> implement something different?
> If there are no objection, id also like to request a number for it.
>
> Thx,
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

--001a1140683e73bd4b0535874afc
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">This works for segwit version 1 with the addition of also =
using a different chain id.=C2=A0<div><br></div><div>I presume that segwit =
version 2 will be implementing schnorr signatures. What do we know about th=
e likely implementation details? Is there any way to avoid using a third de=
rivation path to support it?</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br clea=
r=3D"all"><div><div class=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signa=
ture"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><br=
>Aaron Voisine</div><div>co-founder and CEO<br><a href=3D"http://breadwalle=
t.com" target=3D"_blank">breadwallet</a></div></div></div></div></div></div=
></div></div>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Daniel Weig=
l via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists=
.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.o=
rg</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg=
in:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi List,<br>
<br>
Following up to the discussion last month ( <a href=3D"https://lists.linuxf=
oundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-May/012695.html" rel=3D"noreferrer=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev=
/2016-May/012695.html</a> ), ive prepared a proposal for a BIP here:<br>
<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <a href=3D"https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/=
blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediawiki" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blan=
k">https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediaw=
iki</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Any comments on it? Does anyone working on a BIP44 compliant wallet impleme=
nt something different?<br>
If there are no objection, id also like to request a number for it.<br>
<br>
Thx,<br>
Daniel<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a1140683e73bd4b0535874afc--