Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 284EC91A for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:22:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.sldev.cz (mail.sldev.cz [51.254.7.247]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83750174 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8835BE5B3; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:26:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sldev.cz Received: from mail.sldev.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a1-sjF5oZvcq; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tetra.site (unknown [10.8.8.107]) by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0A7EE379; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:26:39 +0000 (UTC) To: Jonas Schnelli , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion References: <57B31EBC.1030806@jonasschnelli.ch> <342485b4-586d-c753-94b6-999d5fc14e46@satoshilabs.com> <57B32D9D.8080908@jonasschnelli.ch> From: Pavol Rusnak Message-ID: <0e9cd5e4-eba0-4dd3-7e8f-258c899cd66f@satoshilabs.com> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:21:57 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57B32D9D.8080908@jonasschnelli.ch> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eVg8c0O2rE62w0SBaTpGFmNACDwjNoQqg" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hardware Wallet Standard X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:22:07 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --eVg8c0O2rE62w0SBaTpGFmNACDwjNoQqg Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Gn8ldchnTqlr8E6Vo17wHcxk29pv21DR4" From: Pavol Rusnak To: Jonas Schnelli , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Message-ID: <0e9cd5e4-eba0-4dd3-7e8f-258c899cd66f@satoshilabs.com> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hardware Wallet Standard References: <57B31EBC.1030806@jonasschnelli.ch> <342485b4-586d-c753-94b6-999d5fc14e46@satoshilabs.com> <57B32D9D.8080908@jonasschnelli.ch> In-Reply-To: <57B32D9D.8080908@jonasschnelli.ch> --Gn8ldchnTqlr8E6Vo17wHcxk29pv21DR4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16/08/16 17:13, Jonas Schnelli wrote: > I'm aware of this approach but I don't think this makes sense long term= =2E > We need a better way on the protocol level to validate inputs amounts > (where segwit is a first step towards this). So you basically rephrased what I am saying but in another words. > I think we should collaborate together and work out a standard. I am for it. I am just saying we should create a standard for new forms of transactions (Segwit and maybe Lightning), not the current "ugly" ones= =2E --=20 Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol "stick" Rusnak SatoshiLabs.com --Gn8ldchnTqlr8E6Vo17wHcxk29pv21DR4-- --eVg8c0O2rE62w0SBaTpGFmNACDwjNoQqg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXsy+VAAoJEJHzszm5oCo939AQAJEBqLbc7zuwsv4oKEaJX5Yp HEb1UGKy3oyyepLWRojIIrKZVAD03bnzLrOEoEdv2LK3ikH3tW2hexCgksOj5WBx iuDO8YXjRPAK/X7jsOZqkkTnh7OxCBo4kL4J615Mv602S6pJnRmCRDaWWabU1QHn K1FKHDbE7WmL7wYHyubxPWfnKgvEaJfcApqnqX3YD/XFB0Ud2RcPo4NuLzT9/cY4 sV0yIflIJ7w1bsHMk4BpDZWx4pmJiubUjXgX5TiCDDfU/HWKWBeUamcXJDGlwCyA NirXdEKZORL7UDbCD8BNBAcZPu3nSgu8kH4COhkJ5HT7ZLNUQVlz7U5/RP0iYl5h oS7PUH5SmQRciOr/Ju3U3zO/QIpzx+SOLqLuycG5HF6xAI2kDtyeki7awawr1c0Q xqvbML0l5CCUL1hMFFrQABg/6AyTCFs6K9oQITt/bStu7tPfvDQ6tJA7pYOSX+U3 cNL5Z/LJIPaJrF7YSj4qZZ6RrJxtvXrAqeOgUQSfuhbhPj7+5ZDtWcffHynU7ocn T/YcOU5z6QHxyGOhnZHYWxgwMWjvNZ6zuF5KjuTuKdyUQ5BWXfncasWSAYnTYJN4 rM93uSLifVvk2SkC3WMhiUHbsaZHIdV5JM9MKv/Ejl4VnDP6JQ3Vn+aXXI4eCj3N muA4Ujs4856EmYL5ezHx =Rt48 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eVg8c0O2rE62w0SBaTpGFmNACDwjNoQqg--