From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:15:58 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.0; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <CAKaEYhK4oXH3hB7uS3=AEkA6r0VB5OYyTua+LOP18rq+rYajHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<201311142301.39550.luke@dashjr.org> <5285589E.10707@monetize.io>
In-Reply-To: <5285589E.10707@monetize.io>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201311150015.59537.luke@dashjr.org>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] moving the default display to mbtc
Precedence: list

On Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:11:26 PM Mark Friedenbach wrote:
> On 11/14/13 3:01 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > I think we all know the problems with the term "address". People
> > naturally compare it to postal addresses, email addresses, etc,
> > which operate fundamentally different. I suggest that we switch to
> > using "invoice id" to refer to what is now known as addresses, as
> > that seems to get the more natural understanding to people. On the
> > other hand, with the advent of the payment protocol, perhaps
> > address/invoice id use will die out soon?
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> "key id" (thanks sipa).

To be clear, I wasn't suggesting renaming scriptPubKey, which sipa was talking 
about with "key id"; just the destination-for-transaction presented to
end-users.