Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R02ge-0008KW-3H for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 02:43:56 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me designates 173.246.101.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.246.101.161; envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me; helo=mail.bluematt.me; Received: from vps.bluematt.me ([173.246.101.161] helo=mail.bluematt.me) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1R02gd-0005JL-2E for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 02:43:56 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (dhcp04346.highsouth-resnet.unc.edu [152.23.97.28]) by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD9BCBB3 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 04:43:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Matt Corallo To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 22:43:48 -0400 Message-ID: <1315104228.4816.1.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1R02gd-0005JL-2E Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.4rc1 known bugs X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 02:43:56 -0000 On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 20:13 -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote: > Quick status update on 0.4; I probably won't have time to tackle these > properly before Tuesday: > > + sipa found what looks like a deadlock between the addr-handling and > IRC-join-handling code. > + UukGoblin reports a deadlock problem on a bitcoind handling getwork requests. > > If you want to get more familiar with the bitcoin code and you have a > lot of patience, tracking down deadlocks a great way to do it. > > + ArtForz found a performance bug with transactions that have > thousands of inputs and outputs on the solidcoin test network. > (not as big an issue for bitcoin due to fees being based on > transaction size, but still worrying) > + (my fault) Gitian doesnt build properly.