Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UilcB-0001xS-DY for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 01 Jun 2013 13:12:59 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.42; envelope-from=runesvend@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f42.google.com; Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1UilcA-0006zF-D2 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 01 Jun 2013 13:12:59 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id n12so1459313wgh.1 for ; Sat, 01 Jun 2013 06:12:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.95.167 with SMTP id dl7mr12994426wjb.46.1370092372205; Sat, 01 Jun 2013 06:12:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.161.227 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 06:12:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rune_Kj=E6r_Svendsen?= Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 15:12:32 +0200 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb042f227a65304de177d99 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (runesvend[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1UilcA-0006zF-D2 Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Implementing batch processing for -blocknotify X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 13:12:59 -0000 --047d7bb042f227a65304de177d99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for the input all! You make a lot of sense :). I will go with the Unix socket method, I think. It's about time I learn about those. /Rune On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Chris Double wrote: > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Wladimir wrote: > > Using zmq is a great fit for high-speed notifications such as this. Have > you > > seen the pull request to integrate zmq directly into bitcoind, so that > you > > don't even need -blocknotify? > > > > https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2415 > > > > If not: we could use some testing there! > > I hadn't seen this, thanks! I've integrated zmq myself for block > notifications in bitcoin and the alt coins I use it on my bitparking > merge mining pool. I would love to see something official. I'll try > out the patch in the pull request. > > Chris. > -- > http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite > It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production > Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. > Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > --047d7bb042f227a65304de177d99 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for the input all! You make a lot of sense :). I wi= ll go with the Unix socket method, I think. It's about time I learn abo= ut those.

/R= une


On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Chris Do= uble <chris.double@double.co.nz> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
> Using zmq is a great fit for high-speed notifications such as this. Ha= ve you
> seen the pull request to integrate zmq directly into bitcoind, so that= you
> don't even need -blocknotify?
>
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2415
>
> If not: we could use some testing there!

I hadn't seen this, thanks! I've integrated zmq myself for bl= ock
notifications in bitcoin and the alt coins I use it on my bitparking
merge mining pool. I would love to see something official. I'll try
out the patch in the pull request.

Chris.
--
http://www.bluis= hcoder.co.nz

---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.s= f.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment

--047d7bb042f227a65304de177d99--