Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XmiE1-0003Xj-BH for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:01:09 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.175; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f175.google.com; Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1XmiE0-0004p5-JD for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:01:09 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id h3so12624654igd.14 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 04:01:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.149.203 with SMTP id x194mr12094970iod.22.1415361663341; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 04:01:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.249.170 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 04:01:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20141106213215.GA12918@savin.petertodd.org> <545BF0C2.3030201@bluematt.me> <545BFAD6.1000504@riseup.net> <20141106232649.GD26859@savin.petertodd.org> <545C0617.7020300@riseup.net> <20141107000310.GA6532@savin.petertodd.org> <20141107084810.GA7878@savin.petertodd.org> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:01:03 +0100 Message-ID: From: Wladimir To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment_Elbaz?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (laanwj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1XmiE0-0004p5-JD Cc: Bitcoin Dev , Justus Ranvier Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] The difficulty of writing consensus critical code: the SIGHASH_SINGLE bug X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:01:09 -0000 On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Cl=C3=A9ment Elbaz wro= te: > Thinking out loud here : would it make sense to separate the consensus co= de > into some kind of "Bitcoin Kernel" (similar to the Linux Kernel) project > that could be used by anyone ? Yes, we're moving in that direction. First with a script verification library in 0.10, which will be extended to other parts of the consensus by 0.11 and after that. Wladimir