Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5AE22C for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:14:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mx-out03.mykolab.com (mx.kolabnow.com [95.128.36.1]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 823E6FB for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:14:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kolabnow.com X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx03.mykolab.com (mx03.mykolab.com [10.20.7.101]) by mx-out03.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CD3A20859 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 16:14:28 +0100 (CET) From: Tom Zander To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:15:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1758904.yvpRk0eHcr@cherry> In-Reply-To: References: <7169224.bI6Cz5OEL8@cherry> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:16:41 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Classic 1.2.0 released X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:14:32 -0000 On Saturday, 7 January 2017 00:55:19 CET Eric Lombrozo wrote: > Your release announcement does not make it clear that Bitcoin Classic is > incompatible with the current Bitcoin network and its consensus rules. To explain why I didn't write that; Bitcoin Classic is not incompatible with the current Bitcoin network and its consensus rules. -- Tom Zander Blog: https://zander.github.io Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel