Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE090F5B for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 20:28:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail149095.authsmtp.com (outmail149095.authsmtp.com [62.13.149.95]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EA6188 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 20:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237]) by punt15.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t8RKRxn6042121; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 21:27:59 +0100 (BST) Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com [75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t8RKRtPv068708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 27 Sep 2015 21:27:58 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:27:55 -0400 From: Peter Todd To: jl2012@xbt.hk Message-ID: <20150927202755.GA10332@savin.petertodd.org> References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Server-Quench: 3e2a1cd0-6556-11e5-9f76-002590a135d3 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aAdMdAUUC1AEAgsB AmMbWVVeUlp7XGs7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr VklWR1pVCwQmRRRj fXxaMl9ycQ1BeHY+ YURjVj5YCUYrdBUp QlNSEGgAeGZhPWUC WRZfcR5UcAFPdx8U a1N6AHBDAzANdhEy HhM4ODE3eDlSNhEd ZgwRYklaTUsTGjkt DzojJWtyVWYlag4Q CzsNCWI9OWsvH38T H2poMf9/ X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY! X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 20:28:02 -0000 --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 04:26:12PM -0400, jl2012@xbt.hk wrote: > +1 for deploying BIP65 immediately without further waiting. Agree > with all Peter's points. Thanks! > By the way, is there any chance to backport it to 0.9? In the > deployment of BIP66 some miners requested a backport to 0.9 and > that's why we have 0.9.5. I certainly could, though there's good reasons to move to v0.10.x; I'd want to first hear from miners as to why they're still on v0.9.x --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 00000000000000000f8ed62397b82b10e56b9aea309fb18c37985d1405808c4f --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGrBAEBCACVBQJWCFFHXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwZjhlZDYyMzk3YjgyYjEwZTU2YjlhZWEzMDlmYjE4YzM3 OTg1ZDE0MDU4MDhjNGYvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQJIFAPaXwkfumNwf/YTj+rSUgiBWOi8w/+LyLBuu6 BDNsjVzyg32i9KiunipEl2N2AVFLvsOrz2lpmVCk88wxdE0hSOUphlSWpa1Btn6K 1qrRnE7Mh1DYCkdUQfSsiJGhEhVwIjZkE49nI0iL23tC7mmPlbGTRSRA93QtBKQl zAQUcCwef3c5jQEbOA+ffm2V1V4HW3EKl6NyfveLFXj1pHkou9iB2U8BtRLsCd2i /1jXSWmB/pivE1ZsXDayqHiKHj3ltTYbRIxort2VSbHPSll81wvJ9szkCcrpeuBW zNXAaSlCM74vvyom8oossXOqwEBiztkCw54NCcVgwR19lKY3kgqLNFD7/F7Vcw== =gLfu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--