Message-ID: <1335697725.30786.YahooMailNeo@web121007.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org luke-jr/multiclient branch
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>

Hi,=0A=0ACan we pull this? It's been there for almost 20 days now.=0A=0A=0A=
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/32=0A=0AMy comment:=0A"As a fir=
st step, this should probably be pulled right away and then =0Aany improvem=
ents can be made after. Lets get the ball rolling rather =0Athan debating t=
he colour of the bike-shed!=0Ahttp://hackerspaces.org/wiki/The_Bikeshed_Ant=
i-Pattern=0A=0AAlthough I agree with Mike Hearn - far better would be a gri=
d of 4 =0Acolumns and X rows. Each box has a linkable title, a picture and =
then =0A850 word blurb from the project. I mean where would libbitcoin fit =
in =0Ahere? I'd want to say the design philosophy behind it and that there'=
s =0APython bindings - a circular peg that doesn't fit in the square boxes =
of this table. Although whatever, that's not important. I'm just happy to =
=0Asee MultiBit, Electrum and Armory get exposure."=0A=0AAnyone that wants =
to see what it looks like can add this to their hosts file:=0A=0A176.31.24.=
241=A0 bitcoin.org=0A=0AThen navigate to http://bitcoin.org=0A