Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 131F6486 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:19:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail148099.authsmtp.net (outmail148099.authsmtp.net [62.13.148.99]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791B913A for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:19:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247]) by punt22.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u5LMJjCk015582; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:19:45 +0100 (BST) Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com [52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u5LMJfm2071709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:19:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 044434010B; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 628E920217; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:19:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:19:40 -0400 From: Peter Todd To: Luke Dashjr , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Message-ID: <20160621221940.GA10368@fedora-21-dvm> References: <201606212044.38931.luke@dashjr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201606212044.38931.luke@dashjr.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Server-Quench: 40bdcf74-37fe-11e6-bcde-0015176ca198 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aQdMdAMUEkAaAgsB AmAbWVdeUVR7XWE7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq T0pMXVMcUQAUfGZX WxweVRh1dwwIfnZw ZAhmXiIPDxJ9cVt+ RRgBCGwHMGF9OjNL BV1YdwJRcQRMLU5E Y1gxNiYHcQ5VPz4z GA41ejw8IwAXBTpY REkIKkgfCV4RGSY7 XB0OVR8OJQUIVzk+ KQcnLVgHVFoWem8T CRN5AQ1AWwA8 X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Even more proposed BIP extensions to BIP 0070 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:19:50 -0000 --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:44:37PM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote: > X509 is entrenched, so it should remain supported. PGP might make sense f= or=20 > people already using it (it provides no real security for un-WoT-networke= d=20 > users), but unforunately, few people use it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but= IIRC=20 > Keybase uses blockchain spam, so definitely not something to be encourage= d if=20 How else would you have keybase accomplish what they're accomplishing, with= the same security model? --=20 https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXab15AAoJEGOZARBE6K+yZpcH+gM60WaYMHWIK8HuBHZbWtdq siZ86L5ZU5ElVjhL8zouiSFs9J2bvfg4sz6E+cisOA/qP388wp8cFvD25DtWKEuv bprYxjaOQXxbxqvzjtC9RvWCAD5DTHwekM547lZRL9YIT3atjKj6sT0qveupUuC4 tkH5O6RPUF8Im9jqAWVGMBlHU45Xjsx8pGVrI+U/7hWGActzVibJGedcIZTNtYVv ljD6X+2i0bDEDwAUZSXckMAg4zeus7UIRwbdob/XD7pE38hUoQ/4i/twEEsi2DZ0 h1xUWKHy2/dodfIzUu12AI3fbQoPA67fRvm5cHc+ysi+3q6bpNyg8Zioj9mq5jU= =wlBC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--