Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VOlNH-0002lK-8p for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:27:11 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.214.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.50; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-bk0-f50.google.com; Received: from mail-bk0-f50.google.com ([209.85.214.50]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1VOlNG-0006Zv-4Y for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:27:11 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f50.google.com with SMTP id mz11so2248478bkb.9 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 02:27:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.205.78.5 with SMTP id zk5mr26934814bkb.25.1380101223480; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 02:27:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.237.74 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 02:27:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <521298F0.20108@petersson.at> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:27:03 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Phtp-EzGXUPX1x6Xc0ZFG1Aq7b4 Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: Gavin Andresen Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d041038a72e319f04e731db46 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1VOlNG-0006Zv-4Y Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol: BIP 70, 71, 72 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:27:11 -0000 --f46d041038a72e319f04e731db46 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 We could also say that if protocol part (https://) is missing, it's implied automatically. So just: bitcoin:1abc........?r=bob.com/r/aZgR I think that's about as small as possible without re-using the pubkey as a token in the url. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Mike Hearn wrote: > >> BTW, on the "make qrcodes more scannable" front -- is it too late to >> change BIP 72 so the new param is just "r" instead of "request"? Every byte >> helps when it comes to qrcodes ... >> > > Not too late, assuming there are no objections. Smaller QR codes is a very > good reason to change it. > > -- > -- > Gavin Andresen > --f46d041038a72e319f04e731db46 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We could also say that if protocol part (https://) is miss= ing, it's implied automatically. So just:

bitcoin:1a= bc........?r=3Dbob.com/r/aZgR

I think that's about as small as possible without re-usi= ng the pubkey as a token in the url.
=

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Gavin A= ndresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, S= ep 24, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
BTW, on the "make qrcodes more scannable" front = -- is it too late to change BIP 72 so the new param is just "r" i= nstead of "request"? Every byte helps when it comes to qrcodes ..= .

Not too late, assuming there are no = objections. Smaller QR codes is a very good reason to change it.
=C2=A0
 --
--
Gavin Andresen<= br>

--f46d041038a72e319f04e731db46--