Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1V1jFl-00048v-Ow for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:32:13 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.219.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.47; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f47.google.com; Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.219.47]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1V1jFk-0008QZ-3F for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:32:13 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m1so2439202oag.6 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:32:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.53.194 with SMTP id d2mr27160002obp.28.1374611526689; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.23.36 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:32:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:32:06 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: AsQ-KxFK1wKfQJJbGKffJvaeQkU Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: Gregory Maxwell Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158c5aec0b3e304e233af32 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1V1jFk-0008QZ-3F Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Linux packaging letter X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:32:14 -0000 --089e0158c5aec0b3e304e233af32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes. Someone decided to actually delete the people who had signed so far and replace it with a request for PGP signing - no. Not everyone even uses PGP, which is overkill for this anyway. I'm going to roll the document back and lock it. Sorry, I had hoped people would respect my request to not fiddle with the content, which they did not do. If you'd like to have your name on it, let me know or post here and I'll add it. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Mike Hearn wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Some of us have put together an open letter to the Linux packaging > > community, outlining why Bitcoin is different to other programs and > asking > > them to not patch or modify the upstream sources. > > > > Please consider signing it if you agree (I think the wording by now is > fine, > > so don't edit the contents - use the comment feature if you want to > though). > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1naenR6N6fMWSpHM0f4jpQhYBEkCEQDbLBs8AXC19Y-o/edit#heading=h.i7tz3gqh65mi > > Ah, this is not entirely in sync with the last (mostly minor) > copyedits that had been signed off by Gavin, Pieter, Jgarzik, and I... > but that appears to be a smaller issue than the fact that the whole > thing is now being rewritten by "anonymous beaver" and friends. > --089e0158c5aec0b3e304e233af32 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes. Someone decided to actually delete the people who had= signed so far and replace it with a request for PGP signing - no. Not ever= yone even uses PGP, which is overkill for this anyway.

I'm going to roll the document back and lock it. Sorry, I had hoped peo= ple would respect my request to not fiddle with the content, which they did= not do.

If you'd like to have your name on it= , let me know or post here and I'll add it.


On Tue,= Jul 23, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:= 01 PM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some of us have put together an open letter to the Linux packaging
> community, outlining why Bitcoin is different to other programs and as= king
> them to not patch or modify the upstream sources.
>
> Please consider signing it if you agree (I think the wording by now is= fine,
> so don't edit the contents - use the comment feature if you want t= o though).
>
> https= ://docs.google.com/document/d/1naenR6N6fMWSpHM0f4jpQhYBEkCEQDbLBs8AXC19Y-o/= edit#heading=3Dh.i7tz3gqh65mi

Ah, this is not entirely in sync with the last (mostly minor)
copyedits that had been signed off by Gavin, Pieter, Jgarzik, and I...
but that appears to be a smaller issue than the fact that the whole
thing is now being rewritten by "anonymous beaver" and friends.

--089e0158c5aec0b3e304e233af32--