Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Wo4FT-0004Zj-I9 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 24 May 2014 05:11:59 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.219.54 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.54; envelope-from=dscvlt@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f54.google.com; Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.219.54]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Wo4FS-0004f5-Lq for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 24 May 2014 05:11:59 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j17so6504725oag.41 for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 22:11:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.146.210 with SMTP id te18mr10037920oeb.44.1400908313111; Fri, 23 May 2014 22:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.225.66 with HTTP; Fri, 23 May 2014 22:11:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:41:53 +0930 Message-ID: From: Ashley Holman To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d42f85db1f304fa1e627e X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dscvlt[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Wo4FS-0004f5-Lq Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Cut-through propagation of blocks X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 05:11:59 -0000 --047d7b5d42f85db1f304fa1e627e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Ashley Holman wrote: > > * Skip the inv/getdata sequence for new blocks - just push them out > directly to save 1 roundtrip per hop > Upon further reflection, I remove this from my proposal. It's an unrelated optimisation that probably distracts from the main point which is the cut-through forwarding. The rest of the proposal still works if the inv/getdata sequence is retained. --047d7b5d42f85db1f304fa1e627e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Ashley Holman <dscvlt@gmail.com> wrote:
* Skip the inv/getdata sequence for new blocks - just= push them out directly to save 1 roundtrip per hop
<= /blockquote>

Upon further reflection, I remove this from= my proposal. =C2=A0It's an unrelated optimisation that probably distra= cts from the main point which is the cut-through forwarding. =C2=A0The rest= of the proposal still works if the inv/getdata sequence is retained.
--047d7b5d42f85db1f304fa1e627e--