Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WbuaI-0007pq-Nz for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:27:14 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.174; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f174.google.com; Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WbuaH-0001KG-2G for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:27:14 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f174.google.com with SMTP id h18so1068431igc.13 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:27:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.50.146 with SMTP id c18mr16971705igo.42.1398011227780; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:27:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.22.168 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:27:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3A69904F-0A3D-42E9-9DE7-067874E710BB@bitsofproof.com> <5353ECDF.6090903@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 18:27:07 +0200 Message-ID: From: Wladimir To: Chris Pacia Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (laanwj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WbuaH-0001KG-2G Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] "bits": Unit of account X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:27:14 -0000 On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Chris Pacia wrote: > The term bit is really only overloaded for those who are techy. 95% of the > population never uses the term bit in their daily lives and I doubt most > could even name one use of the term. > Plus bit used to be a unit of money way back when, so this is kind of > reclaiming it. I think it's a great fit. That's a very anglocentric way of thinking. Here in the Netherlands, a "bit" is something you put in a horses's mouth. It's also used as imported word (in the information sense). We've never used the term for money. Wladimir