Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1Wd1Gz-0003GR-8s
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 17:47:53 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.160.171 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.160.171; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-yk0-f171.google.com; 
Received: from mail-yk0-f171.google.com ([209.85.160.171])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Wd1Gy-0001qm-Ks
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 17:47:53 +0000
Received: by mail-yk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id q9so1090072ykb.16
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.147.211 with SMTP id t59mr15621900yhj.61.1398275267170; 
	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.170.133.140 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5357F634.2070300@gmail.com>
References: <CANEZrP0szimdFSk23aMfO8p2Xtgfbm6kZ=x3rmdPDFUD73xHMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5357D394.7010908@gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP0dxAOWxg8Nu9LqV1SGE1C1WD2m+EPhg3sFCnFQQVv4kQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5357F634.2070300@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:47:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CABsx9T12e7rbbza9XFi1EY20+0xciWXMiXrOHjTMdj=7Pzsrxw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303a2c8f99189304f7b95483
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gavinandresen[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Wd1Gy-0001qm-Ks
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Coinbase reallocation to discourage
	Finney attacks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 17:47:53 -0000

--20cf303a2c8f99189304f7b95483
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

>
>
> I've formulated my replies to you and this proposal in a more public
> venue, where such discussions of existential changes to the protocol
> more rightfully belong
>
>
I strongly disagree.  It makes perfect sense to discuss changes here,
first, where there are lots of people who understand how the system works
at a very detailed level.

And why do you think your blog is more public than this open, publicly
archived mailing list???

-- 
--
Gavin Andresen

--20cf303a2c8f99189304f7b95483
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
</div></div>I&#39;ve formulated my replies to you and this proposal in a mo=
re public<br>
venue, where such discussions of existential changes to the protocol<br>
more rightfully belong<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I strongly d=
isagree. =C2=A0It makes perfect sense to discuss changes here, first, where=
 there are lots of people who understand how the system works at a very det=
ailed level.</div>
<div><br></div><div>And why do you think your blog is more public than this=
 open, publicly archived mailing list???</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>-=
-<br>Gavin Andresen<br>
</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div></div>

--20cf303a2c8f99189304f7b95483--