Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1UFnS1-0001ni-Hd
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:18:45 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.215.48; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-la0-f48.google.com; 
Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1UFnRz-0001D7-Hk
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:18:45 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id fq13so1268758lab.35
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.148.133 with SMTP id ts5mr18132142lab.2.1363187916820;
	Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.96.164 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130313150501.GA14067@savin>
References: <201303131256.30144.luke@dashjr.org> <20130313150501.GA14067@savin>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:18:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgT13KOu59O9u+ouQvo9BNUL-0EMeK1i2C980VpdQ41Pbw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1UFnRz-0001D7-Hk
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.8.1 ideas
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:18:45 -0000

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> If we're going to consider doing this, at minimum we need to also

I beg people to not derail discussion about fixing things with
discussion of other controversial changes.

Luke-jr, any chance in getting you to revise your proposal to narrow
the scope to things that don't need serious debate?