Message-ID: <4E531DFD.1070407@trucoin.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:26:53 -0400
From: Fred Concklin <fconcklin@trucoin.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110626 Icedove/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Douglas Huff <dhuff@jrbobdobbs.org>
References: <4E52A7BA.1030208@trucoin.com>	<CAPiTikVrw9QZAdmNwa5RCik+O4QvM4nGMZZx9Xc9L+XmtgX23w@mail.gmail.com>	<201108221549.44440.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CAPiTikUaZbp0t2aYBoJ4w+uvEh=PHorXXLtzkATaOvbUt9qTtw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPiTikUaZbp0t2aYBoJ4w+uvEh=PHorXXLtzkATaOvbUt9qTtw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enig70C62774B9319D9A9D98C913"
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Introduction
Precedence: list

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig70C62774B9319D9A9D98C913
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks for the warm welcome...

I was specifically referring to building with autotools as a starting
point. Primarily autoconf to ease the installation and testing process.

On 08/22/2011 04:12 PM, Douglas Huff wrote:
> I don't think you're actually familiar with either of those tools. A ru=
n
> script is not much different than an init script?
In this regard I was referring to running bitcoin in /etc/init.d on
Debian based systems. By init script, I was referring to making scripts
run at boot time.
> Those who live in tonal caves shouldn't crap on themselves, or somethin=
g.
>
> On Aug 22, 2011 2:49 PM, "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
>> On Monday, August 22, 2011 3:30:04 PM Douglas Huff wrote:
>>> On Aug 22, 2011 2:26 PM, "Fred Concklin" <fconcklin@trucoin.com> wrot=
e:
>>>> I'm also interested in work to daemonize bitcoin on boot and
> furthering
>>>> work to bring bitcoin into general coding and implementation paradig=
ms
>>>> seen on GNU/Linux platforms.
>>> What? It already works fine in this regard using standard tools.
> Especially
>>> easy with daemontools/runit.
>> He said standard *coding and implementation paradigms*. This has nothi=
ng
> to do
>> with integration with some non-standard "init replacement" that goes
> against
>> the whole design of Unix.
>>
>> What I understand this to mean, is properly abstracting the components=

> such
>> that the node, wallet, and GUI can work together while being distinct
> parts.
>> In this sense, Fred, you may be interested in working on coming up wit=
h a
>> standard for a https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Wallet_protocol

I'll check this out.

fpc


--------------enig70C62774B9319D9A9D98C913
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk5THf0ACgkQxahj/GpMqhQUjQCgpgL9o460NwHcVhMTuKORPCSj
N+MAnAntDM/7crcW+q1GM6wqeoU1Tw5e
=Mm2Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig70C62774B9319D9A9D98C913--