Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SQdLx-00087w-32 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 05 May 2012 11:40:45 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from vps7135.xlshosting.net ([178.18.90.41]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1SQdLw-0000Xz-0V for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 05 May 2012 11:40:45 +0000 Received: by vps7135.xlshosting.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C723B60C25; Sat, 5 May 2012 13:40:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 13:40:35 +0200 From: Pieter Wuille To: "Rebroad (sourceforge)" Message-ID: <20120505114034.GA24827@vps7135.xlshosting.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://sipa.ulyssis.org/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.2 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list X-Headers-End: 1SQdLw-0000Xz-0V Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Potential network split when individual tx used as coinbase? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 11:40:45 -0000 On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 09:31:39AM +0100, Rebroad (sourceforge) wrote: > Hi, > > > > > Looking at: > https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/3e52aaf2121d597ab1ed012b65e37f9cb5f2754e#src/main.cpp-P52 > > It appears that 8 months ago the code was changed to DoS(100) nodes sending > on txs that use individual txs as the coinbase. Does this mean txs that are > 0 confirmed? > > Or have I misread the code? I think so, see my comment there. -- Pieter