Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D6DC0001 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FB084222 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:05:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.499 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6XTNYOpttDUc for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:05:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-wm1-f53.google.com (mail-wm1-f53.google.com [209.85.128.53]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E758084539 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f53.google.com with SMTP id n22so1552640wmc.2 for ; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 06:05:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ZtEAsxtKvhgopix6QFQhBt+w6FE/kXOAbI5D0qwnUsk=; b=E7nnrl1Mpb6NogS6RVOummpMoZ15FrWM3UZf2BCFI3rkxPSGYbNFkOrfwEV3HOn0Q9 93ODZ60qpt6u1YcIyI4ekoUhMbORiNnQjzugxH/ZkI7EsBFdIPFKXj3am1b9P4GUcovd PWdtMRQ6aGwnssJDwPeIsBj7kdz+9zbYSzKQcwfo+JRFdhJrfbDnayNPCokpEZA1gx1N dRi/N3kqaoSuEy0UrzRn7q8KYzd5Qd566RDLxOgjM4Y8uGOH4bWO4lWclyGhnGkiYGKs S2bFOqVsc1PdxH0FjjlWoD0RwemWxqlb16pOwwqaJ77aajnMQFeW23kxjVVQHj/Z3K7X dGaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jpbcw1MDIkBgNdlcnjEJ4iolGw2dpzhGgiRx7QrQeLdfxr3X2 pjiUxFPHtb3gh28aFgljAd8dk6K0UzvgxgtP6+NBVULYxBEvpg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymKkGyort/xZVymKBjmEPCOVaK3yZ/IZFX5OueCpx5R2rVaqQDHiax6sO4rSE35uxy2TV7y4qz/gs1CKFNwyY= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc1a:: with SMTP id f26mr9031512wmh.19.1614953106539; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 06:05:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ryan Grant Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:04:40 +0000 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 14:05:10 -0000 On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:48 PM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitcoin-dev wrote: > My concern was that the more complex scripts allow obfuscation of the Pay To address This is no different from options available in P2SH, or from the obfuscation achieved by generating a new address for a payment.