Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VkchI-0000Bo-PA for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 16:38:12 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.219.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.47; envelope-from=decker.christian@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f47.google.com; Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.219.47]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1VkchH-0006e8-0F for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 16:38:12 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id k1so3342495oag.6 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 08:38:05 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.117.195 with SMTP id kg3mr20776369obb.17.1385311085623; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 08:38:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.130.198 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 08:37:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Christian Decker Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:37:25 +0100 Message-ID: To: Gregory Maxwell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (decker.christian[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1VkchH-0006e8-0F Cc: Bitcoin Development Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Network propagation speeds X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 16:38:13 -0000 Sure thing, I'm looking for a good way to publish these measurements, but I haven't found a good option yet. They are rather large in size, so I'd rather not serve them along with the website as it hasn't got the capacity. Any suggestions? If the demand is not huge I could provide them on a per user basis. -- Christian Decker On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Christian Decker > wrote: >> Since this came up again during the discussion of the Cornell paper I >> thought I'd dig up my measurement code from the Information >> Propagation paper and automate it as much as possible. > > Could you publish the block ids and timestamp sets for each block? > > It would be useful in correlating propagation information against > block characteristics.